Research indicates that nowadays, some consumers are less influenced by advertising than in the past. What do you think are the reason for this? Is this a positive or negative development?
In that contemporary worl, consumer is lesss affect by advertising about habits and decisions for buying product. In my perspective, the reason for this because everyone always research the feedback on the Internet and have many tricks so they choose protect themselves from advertising.More, this phenomenon can be justified from certain angles, but it’s potential still coexist.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of consumer is less influenced by advertising. First, government subsidies for advertising are believed to equalize job and income opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their family background. This financial support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall shopping rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society. Second, consumer is less affect by advertising would probably result in a higher supply of qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that choosing and how users perceive products is imperative to foster the economic and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once there are less people influenced by advertising. First, less influential in customer’s purchase decisions and habits would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from advertising and product, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Second, people are less influenced from advertising would tempt many young people including those who are not shopping pursuits or show no interest in research the meaning of product, thereby adding great burdens for company’s activities and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable product paths. It, instead, would be a more advertising viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted customers.
In conclusion, this argument have some positive sight but in my opinion the negative is coexist and government need consider for solution in the future, to promotes an better life and development country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- The best way to procedure a happier society is to ensure that there are only smaller differences between the richest and the poorest member To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problem Give your option 73
- Some people think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problem Give your option 63
- The map below show the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 87
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: You might need to use the base form of the verb here: 'promote'.
Suggestion: promote
...consider for solution in the future, to promotes an better life and development country....
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...for solution in the future, to promotes an better life and development country.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75774647887 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05911602185 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608450704225 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0101077718 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.230769231 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256328848837 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881200552637 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493042778995 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160580448563 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228259745603 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.