The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The bar chart illustrates the number of people who went to cinemas to watch movies in one European nation on different days in a week, its compares the difference in 3 years 2003, 2005 and 2007.
It can be seen from the chart that people who chose 3 days weekends to went to cinemas significantly outnumber weekdays. Saturday is the day which was chosen the most in 3 years.
Firstly, in 2003, 2005 and 2007, the percentage of people who chose to went to the movies on Friday, Saturday and Sunday accounts for a large amount. Friday in that 3 years stability at the 30, at the same time, Sunday is also the day when a large number of people went to see movies. In 2003 it was 30%, then increased to just under 40% in 2005 and fell to well under 40% in 2007. Furthermore, the percentage of people who went to cinemas on Saturday was far higher than on Friday and Sunday. The highest percentage is around 45% who went to the cinema on Saturday in 2005, besides, about 40% in 2003 and less than 45% in 2007.
Secondly, weekdays was not nearly as high as weekends, on Monday, the number of people watched movies in the cinema was half as much as Friday, it was about 10% in 2003, nearly 15% in 2005 and more than 10% in 2007. Tuesday was a little more than Monday, it was about 20% in 2003, more than 15% in 2005 and just under 20% in 2007. The percentage of people went to cinemas on Wednesday decreased from well over 15% to less than 10% between 2003 and 2007. In addition, Thursday is one third Saturday when there was around 12% people chose that day in 2003, less than 10% in 2005 and well under 15% in 2007.
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 73
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... same time, Sunday is also the day when a large number of people went to see movies. In 2003 it w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e than 15% in 2005 and just under 20% in 2007. The percentage of people went to c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, well, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 307.0 196.424390244 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27687296417 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21016432968 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.381107491857 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0363550067 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.416666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204165168783 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993357111702 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827072638461 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172613209954 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918941438277 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.84 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.42 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.