The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.
The bar chart illustrates the number of students in both genders, who studied in further education in the UK, categorized by full-time and part-time education, in the years 1970, 1980 and 1990.
It can be clearly seen from the chart that the number of students who applied for part-time education outnumbered the others over a period shown. In addition, the figure for part-time female students experienced an upward trend.
As for male students, around 1000 individuals chose part-time education, compared to well under 200 people, who applied for full-time education, while the figure for females was just under 800 individuals in 1970. Despite a significant drop of 200 people in 1980, the number of part-time males recovered to 900 people in 1990, whereas that of full-time males witnessed a consistently slight rise of 250 individuals over a 30 year period.
By 1970, well under 50 females had chosen full-time education, which was nowhere near as many as those studied part-time, at 750 individuals. Following this, the number of full-time females saw a swift rise of around 200 people in 1980, and then remained fairly stable 10 years later. In terms of women applying for part-time education, a slight rise of 800 individuals was seen in 1980, which doubled that chose to study full-time, after which the figure went up drastically to just under 1200 individuals in 1990.
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12775330396 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76543231803 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515418502203 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4392338399 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213282606202 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120171982092 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623232275884 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167907515525 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515718974336 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.