The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide ( CO2) emissions per person in United Kingdom , Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the average amount of C02 released by individuals in 4 different nations at 10-year intervals over a period of 40 years, commencing from 1967.
Overall, it is clear that there were upward trends in the amount of CO2 emissions per person in Britain, Italy, and Portugal, that in Sweden exhibited a downward trend over the period. It is noticeable that the United Kingdom was the biggest carbon dioxide emissions in all the surveyed years.
In 1967, the average CO2 emissions in Britain stood at nearly 11 metric tonnes, making it the highest figure among the countries. Moreover, more CO2 was released by individuals in Sweden than in Italy, with exactly 9 compared to 4 metric tonnes. Finally, Portugal was recorded the lowest CO2 emissions per person, whose amount was approximately 1.5 metric tonnes.
Afterwards, the amount of carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom and Sweden decreased dramatically in 1997 to end the period at about 8.5 and 5.5 metric tonnes. However, the figure for CO2 emissions in Italy overtook the figure for CO2 emissions in Sweden in 1987, with exactly 7 metric tonnes, which was followed by a constant increase over the period. Additionally, the amount of C02 released by individuals in Portugal experienced a significant increase over the timeline, with 5.5 metric tonnes, respectively, in 2007.
- it is said that people s life now is becoming more and more stressful What do you think is the cause of this what solutions can you suggest 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of spending in a European country from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 73
- Task 1 Map The plans below show how the ground of a particular building has changed over time Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od of 40 years, commencing from 1967. Overall, it is clear that there were upw...
^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overtook the figure for CO2 emissions in Sweden in 1987, with exactly 7 metric to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17567567568 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79132844493 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9471871914 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313308537268 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13817449732 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539560367579 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187755808683 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645951505575 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.