Wealthy nations are required to share their wealth with poorer countries what is your opinion?
Wealth is a great concern for countries like Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India as their economy is not exceeding as it should be. Hence, it has become dire need for developed countries to share their wealth with the poorer countries for their growth and sustainability in the world. This essay will throw the light on the aspects by which wealthy nations can share their wealth with poorer countries in an efficient way.
Firstly, the sharing of assets with other countries via shared programs of health, economy, health and technology shows great impact not only in developmental aspect but also in growth of better relationship among countries. Many countries like America, Europe and China, the super power of world are now developing programs and campaigns through which they can help the Asian countries.
Secondly, they are offering them project based funding to grow and excel in technology, science, and international relationship with other countries. Furthermore, collaboration on different projects has also played an important role in sharing of wealth and knowledge with these countries, like Sea Pack project located on the border of Pakistan and China.
To conclude, from my point of view, it has become essential for wealthy nations, in this era of technology to share their wealth with poorer countries as they are also playing a role in maintenance of earth's global structure. Otherwise, due to poor conditions of sanitation, filtration, and bad traffic problems these countries would be a problem for the developed countries as well due to same habitant on earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | ahmed0001 | 77 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications How it is effecting the way of lives of individual and society 77
- People s poor life is due to lifestyle 55
- Nowadays the problem of animal extinction reaches great attention That is why animal conservations have been created in order to save endangered animals Nevertheless animal conservations are not only the places for animals but also hunters Many hunters go 77
- There days it is very common to have people from two different generation mix in the same workplace Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation Give your own opinion and include relevant example 11
- Why do you think people go to the university 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26377952756 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82030767972 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570866141732 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1644534062 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.555555556 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345152072744 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15679581208 0.0925447433944 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117131759771 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206374441566 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128256267295 0.0609392437508 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.1260098522 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26377952756 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82030767972 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570866141732 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1644534062 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.555555556 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345152072744 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15679581208 0.0925447433944 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117131759771 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206374441566 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128256267295 0.0609392437508 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.1260098522 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.