Integrated writing - TPO 19
Both the article and lecture are discussing about buzzing and buzzers behavior. The passage discusses buzzers negative effects in the consumers market and society and provides reasons of its support whereas the lecture contradicts each point and rejects the reasons made by the author.
Firstly, the article states that all information that you heard about the product by buzzers are just advertising points and most of them are not real. In the other hand according to the lecture, companies choose people as a buzzer for advertising their product, who really used that product and satisfied from consuming it so the points that buzzers state are really their own points and are just based on their personal experiences.
Secondly, the article asserts that since buzzers pretend they are really private consumers this makes an unfair situation that deceives consumers. In contrary, the lecturer argued that, it could not be true because most of the consumers ask a lot of questions about the product before they want to purchase so if they see buzzers provide acceptable answers for those questions they will purchase the product otherwise they will ignore the buzzers.
Thirdly, the author posits that buzzers speared some kind of mistrust throughput the society so the buzzers activity have bad influence on people sense about each other. However, the lecturer is not convinced with the explanation and cast serious doubt. The lecture rejects this point and asserts that not only this point is not true but also the opposite of that could be accurate. He says when people see all points of buzzers about the product are correct they will become more trustful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-26 | oguz.demirbag | 83 | view |
| 2017-09-03 | Texas_2019 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | Mizanur | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | zhrnrz-1992 | 88 | view |
| 2017-11-20 | AR1 | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...scusses buzzers negative effects in the consumers market and society and provides reasons...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ording to the lecture, companies choose people as a buzzer for advertising their produ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f mistrust throughput the society so the buzzers activity have bad influence on p...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buzzers'' or 'buzzer's'?
Suggestion: buzzers'; buzzer's
...mistrust throughput the society so the buzzers activity have bad influence on people s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...correct they will become more trustful.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'whereas', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241379310345 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.162068965517 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0689655172414 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0689655172414 0.0435111971325 159% => OK
Pronouns: 0.051724137931 0.0277247811725 187% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.134482758621 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0275862068966 0.0370669169778 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.39263395275 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00689655172414 0.0208969081088 33% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.134482758621 0.128158765124 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0172413793103 0.0158828679856 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0137931034483 0.0114777025283 120% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1673.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 272.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15073529412 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.408088235294 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.323529411765 0.287516216867 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169117647059 0.187439937562 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106617647059 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39263395275 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 53.2604061625 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 27.2 21.7502111507 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4558486252 49.3711431718 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.3 132.220823453 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 21.7502111507 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 0.878197800319 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 59.5529411765 50.5018328374 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.42682926829 1.90840788429 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.451937469235 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.154834167287 0.142949733639 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0694547595669 0.0787303798458 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.682631298786 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151422901293 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.21790590567 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0871468918476 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.377786145976 0.414875509568 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0546926579971 0.0530846634433 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.332364718235 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0446026805963 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
---------------------
The error messages are due to the topic which is not a complete essay topic.
Rates: 80.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.