The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.
Unlike the present era, in the medieval ages, political leaders were anointed based on their lineage rather than any memorable feats that they had achieved. The medieval ages were also characterized by rampant famines, debilitating diseases and forced labor. No ruler of the medieval ages is considered great because of the inherent skills which he possessed and thus, a political leader is remembered by the feats he has achieved, rather than any inherent qualities that he may possess.
When we look at the history of political leaders, the truly remarkable ones are revered for challenging the social order rather than any inherent talents that they may have possessed. Martin Luther King Jr. is remembered prominently not for his oratory skills, but for abolishing slavery and regaining the esteem of the African-Americans. There have been numerous political leaders who were better at speaking than Martin Luther King, but their greatness pales in comparison to his because they have not overcome such challenges.
Apart from the historical background, we can look at the present corporate world to see that this argument is true. We do not condone nepotism: the process of promoting employees based on their relationship with their employers. The family tree holds no importance to the job at hand. On the same lines, why should the political leaders be applauded for the talents that they were born with? Their capability of handling difficult situations is more important than their latent talents.
Speaking of latent talents, they themselves are varied and perceived differently by different people. Being authoritarian is apposite for the rulers in dictatorships, but is shunned by the countries that have democratic governance where open-mindedness is more favored. It is impossible to define a leader as great under these circumstances. On the other hand, the achievements of the leaders are irrefutable, regardless of his or her location.
Thus, while skills may help in aiding a leader to greatness, the feats that he has achieved plays a far vital role in this. The foundations of our society is built upon the hardships of the few, rather than the talents of the many.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | Mateo Chen | 13 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Jbrachael | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | Thelmacakes | 50 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | alexdipierro24 | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | Prash | 58 | view |
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United Stated.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 79
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 83
- In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their workstations Employees who use the Internet from their workstations need to be identified and punished if we are to reduce th 88
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities. 50
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'apart from', 'speaking of', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.21188630491 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.167958656331 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100775193798 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046511627907 0.0497285424764 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0645994832041 0.0444667217837 145% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.144702842377 0.12292977631 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0723514211886 0.0406280797675 178% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92912468768 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0129198966408 0.030933414821 42% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.108527131783 0.0997080785238 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0129198966408 0.0249443105267 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015503875969 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2197.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 352.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24147727273 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372159090909 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292613636364 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227272727273 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.164772727273 0.132149295362 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92912468768 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559659090909 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 62.121649203 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7058823529 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0402458281 59.4972553346 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.235294118 141.124799967 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 49.9672459893 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.53703703704 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470469461793 0.391690518653 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0939695368323 0.123202303941 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0731741205081 0.077325440228 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.5407495613 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126572984541 0.149214159877 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165423737982 0.161403998019 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737160202385 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350339362214 0.385218514788 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0253895084195 0.0692045440612 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291601179412 0.275328986314 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289691024831 0.0653680567796 44% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.