unlike great thinkers and great artists the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise
The statement " Unlike great thinkers and great artists the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise " is complex and controversial statement. I partially agree with the statement and partially disagree with statement. I provide enough evidences and examples to advocate my view on the given statement.
The concepts which we have to take into consideration are " Liberty of Thought " and " Pervasive effect of a Thought " . Take the case of Great thinkers probably philosophers among whom the liberty of though is very high and is not circumscribed. Moreover the impact of their thoughts on common people is nominal until unless the thought is a remarkable one or one which shows some drastic effect on their social or economical life . Next considering the case of Great artists among whom the limit is very high and are confined to a particular art field as result their impact is also circumscribed to particular level which is also nominal . Finally we can say that as liberty of thoughts is high and pervasive effect of their thoughts is low in case of Great thinkers and Great artists . This implies that their thoughts don't need a public opinion and at the same time they no need to compromise at any instance . To prove this theory we have examples which are deduced from the life's of many artists. Let us consider the life of Michael Jackson, Pop King his liberty of experimenting only effects his market or sales of their album but never shows any impact on the life of individuals.
But viewing this issue from other side the when the remarkable thoughts by some artists may influence the field of art in large manner.
Let us now consider the case of political aspirants or political leaders among whom the Liberty of thought is low most precisely speaking it is little . Particularly among the political candidates who prevail in democratic environment this liberty level is suppressed . The profound study regarding this issue also makes us to think this suppression as a good thing . Because political candidates thoughts influence a lot of people that is the pervasive effect of a thought is high in case of them, so what they need to take the peoples' opinion into consideration . Though sometimes a good willing political candidate uses his liberty to implement a good decision he some times need to compromise or fight against odds if it doesn't favors many people . To emphasize this statement consider the Anti slavery act by Abraham Lincoln during 19th century . This was initially opposed by many american lords but eventually AB's stubborn attitude won the game . So finally we can say that in case of political candidates the liberty of thought is low and pervasive effect of the thought is high .
So I provided irrefutable evidences and logical overview to support my view on this statement. Finally this statement is partially accepted one.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-21 | liakath96 | 50 | view |
2016-11-28 | zeus_helene_leda | 50 | view |
2016-07-18 | ravitejathoram | 50 | view |
2016-07-18 | ravitejathoram | 54 | view |
- unlike great thinkers and great artists the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise 50
- unlike great thinkers and great artists the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise 54
- various types of motivation along with example 73
- students should be encouraged to realize that the mental agility and rhetorical skill must be accompanied by sincerity and the true conviction of their own beliefs. 58
- two approaches of personality building are compared 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The statement Unlike great thinkers and great artists ...
^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...don principle for the sake of compromise is complex and controversial statement. ...
^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h we have to take into consideration are Liberty of Thought and Pervasive effec...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to consideration are Liberty of Thought and Pervasive effect of a Thought . Ta...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsideration are Liberty of Thought and Pervasive effect of a Thought . Take th...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ught and Pervasive effect of a Thought . Take the case of Great thinkers probab...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ght and Pervasive effect of a Thought . Take the case of Great thinkers probabl...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... is very high and is not circumscribed. Moreover the impact of their thoughts on common ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... some drastic effect on their social or economical life . Next considering the case of Gre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ffect on their social or economical life . Next considering the case of Great arti...
^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o particular level which is also nominal . Finally we can say that as liberty of t...
^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...articular level which is also nominal . Finally we can say that as liberty of thoughts ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...case of Great thinkers and Great artists . This implies that their thoughts dont n...
^^
Line 3, column 820, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ists . This implies that their thoughts dont need a public opinion and at the same t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 910, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ey no need to compromise at any instance . To prove this theory we have examples w...
^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...low most precisely speaking it is little . Particularly among the political candid...
^^
Line 6, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ronment this liberty level is suppressed . The profound study regarding this issue...
^^
Line 6, column 366, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o think this suppression as a good thing . Because political candidates thoughts i...
^^
Line 6, column 530, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... of them, so what they need to take the peoples opinion into consideration . Though som...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 564, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e the peoples opinion into consideration . Though sometimes a good willing politic...
^^
Line 6, column 726, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... compromise or fight against odds if it doesnt favors many people . To emphasize this ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 751, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nst odds if it doesnt favors many people . To emphasize this statement consider th...
^^
Line 6, column 850, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t by Abraham Lincoln during 19th century . This was initially opposed by many amer...
^^
Line 6, column 952, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ually ABs stubborn attitude won the game . So finally we can say that in case of p...
^^
Line 6, column 1087, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... pervasive effect of the thought is high . So I provided irrefutable evidences ...
^^
Line 8, column 96, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...w to support my view on this statement. Finally this statement is partially accepted on...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261208576998 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.144249512671 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109161793372 0.0880659088768 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0506822612086 0.0497285424764 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0526315789474 0.0444667217837 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126705653021 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0233918128655 0.0406280797675 58% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75298012003 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0253411306043 0.030933414821 82% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105263157895 0.0997080785238 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00779727095517 0.0249443105267 31% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0214424951267 0.0148568991511 144% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2943.0 2732.02544248 108% => OK
No of words: 502.0 452.878318584 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8625498008 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344621513944 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.290836653386 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189243027888 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125498007968 0.132149295362 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75298012003 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426294820717 0.48968727796 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.3979927463 55.4138127331 87% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8181818182 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8578697159 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.772727273 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.363636363636 0.674092028746 54% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 26.0 5.21349557522 499% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 51.9018471568 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.66141732283 1.64882698954 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447946532097 0.391690518653 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107923416349 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0674612408576 0.077325440228 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.54405952867 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179484949708 0.149214159877 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159880094558 0.161403998019 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162185367752 0.0892212321368 182% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.259996121507 0.385218514788 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0623389010453 0.0692045440612 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272627731341 0.275328986314 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187196163973 0.0653680567796 286% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.