Professors benefit from appearing on TV.
The author of the passage and professor has conflict in the thoughts about whether appearance of professor on television would benifit professors,university and television viewers or not. Passage states that it would benifit much to all of them while professor states that it would not benifit as much.
The passage states that appearance on television would benifit professor as they would acquire reputations and the views and thoughts would be shared among thousands of televsion viewers rather a narrow academic community. Professor refutes this argument by stating that it would acquire a reputation of an entertainer rather than serious reseacher. Professor also states that it would lead to be not invited in the important meeting and thus reputations would get much more reduced. It leads to difficulty to get the fund from any organization to do research.
The passage states that appearance on television would benifit university as professor from any university would impact positively and would get more donations and more applications from potential students.Professor refutes this statement by stating that if the professor would come on television than the shooting time, traveling time and even time for getting ready would decrease in the allocation of the time to research work and the students of university. This would cause for the university.
The passage states that appearance on television would benifit television viewers as professor would give them to taste of the expertise, although the knowledge is superficial. Professor invalidates this by stating that if professor would give only superficial knowledge than it would not be useful as per the knowledge he acquired. Professor states that this task can be achieved by the anchors of the news channel who would do homework.
In conclusion, it can be said that if any professor would do television appearance frequently than it would not benifit rather cause loss for the university, television viewers and even for the professors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | himal | view | |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown: “If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighbouring town, Hayesworth, pass 50
- “Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.” 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action. Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the 50
- Professors benefit from appearing on TV. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , university
...r on television would benifit professors,university and television viewers or not. Passage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Professor
...re applications from potential students.Professor refutes this statement by stating that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260479041916 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.152694610778 0.158904122519 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0449101796407 0.0723426182421 62% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0508982035928 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0359281437126 0.0277247811725 130% => OK
Prepositions: 0.173652694611 0.128828473217 135% => OK
Participles: 0.0269461077844 0.0370669169778 73% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.05762369336 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0209580838323 0.0208969081088 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101796407186 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0718562874251 0.0158828679856 452% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00299401197605 0.0114777025283 26% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2023.0 1645.83664459 123% => OK
No of words: 316.0 271.125827815 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.40189873418 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386075949367 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.338607594937 0.287516216867 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.243670886076 0.187439937562 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.205696202532 0.113142543107 182% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.05762369336 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401898734177 0.539623497131 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.1502934265 53.8517498576 73% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.3333333333 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.719277645 49.3711431718 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.583333333 132.220823453 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.878197800319 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 60.194092827 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.925 1.90840788429 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0501259906776 0.549887131256 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.195382022882 0.142949733639 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.06683300186 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.686011036518 0.631733273073 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177858851007 0.139662658121 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243522572442 0.266732575781 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268959994323 0.103435571967 26% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.483444811165 0.414875509568 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0583755918408 0.0530846634433 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0387532623692 0.40443939384 10% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154140947099 0.0528353158467 29% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.