extra 1
Without any shadow of doubt, people are the cornerstone of a successful society; indeed, the more individuals of a country are qualified, the more powerful the country is. Eagerness to learn new issues is inherent in human beings. With this in mind, some believe that it stands to reason that people can learn things better from individuals who are at the own levels than from those who are at a higher level, while others hold the opposite view. I, personally, subscribe to the latter attitude based on quite a few reasons, two of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that teachers and supervisors have a better and deeper understanding of subjects. It is crystal clear that the more one works on one thing, the more experience he or she will acquire. As a result, they can teach us how to deal with problems. I clarify my point with a true story that happened to me. Four months ago, I was supposed to learn Lisrel software in order to complete my thesis. None of my friends and my classmates could help me. So, I was required to take for a hand from a person who was familiar with the software.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the first perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that in today's modern world, everyone has to be in rush so as not to be left behind in contending for the "field of competition", and people try more and more to improve their situations. Thus, it is possible that if one asks one of his or her friends to help him, one's friends may not assist him of her in solving their problem due to competition; however, when people want to learn new issues from those at a higher level, those higher level individuals do not consider those people as their rivals, and hence they help people to solve their problems in an excellent fashion. For instance, co-workers often compete with each other to enjoy a better job position, so it is likely not to aid their colleagues in their problems, while supervisors, who have a higher job status in companies, are more willing to helping workers to solve their problems.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that even though learning from fellow students and co-workers has its own privileges, the merits of learning from individuals who are at a higher level outweigh those of learning issues from people who are at our level on the grounds not only higher level people are more professional, but also they do not consider people who are at a lower level as their rivals.
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past. 73
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 73
- tpo 11. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an excellent fashion" with adverb for "excellent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hey help people to solve their problems in an excellent fashion. For instance, co-workers often compete...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...level outweigh those of learning issues from people who are at our level on the grou...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in summary', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.208984375 0.229887763892 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.1484375 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0859375 0.0866891130778 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05078125 0.046263068375 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.07421875 0.0685040099705 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142578125 0.118717715034 120% => OK
Participles: 0.029296875 0.0351676179071 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73387210408 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0390625 0.0309702414327 126% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0859375 0.0887237588012 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.009765625 0.0209618222197 47% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0234375 0.0139019557991 169% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2623.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 461.0 408.028673835 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68980477223 5.86048508987 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.323210412148 0.338922669872 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212581344902 0.251872472559 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.158351409978 0.174417080927 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0997830802603 0.112833075102 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73387210408 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505422993492 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 58.1429202735 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 30.7333333333 20.5533526081 150% => OK
Sentence length SD: 130.008649285 48.84282405 266% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.866666667 120.699889404 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7333333333 20.5533526081 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.644075263715 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 51.9914678236 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.39285714286 1.45489161554 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103810662001 0.103427244359 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0723204841905 0.0752933317313 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.519163640377 0.497263757937 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.201785455623 0.151897553556 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.311980489776 0.336927656856 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0249093786508 0.067059652881 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.