TPO 19
The main idea of both the reading and the passage is about whether companies should employ buzzing techniques, which is a new method of advertising, or not. Considering this, the author offers three reason in order to show that the buzzing technique is not proper. The lecturer, who works a buzzer part-time, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessment, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the ways the reading just argued. The lecturer demonstrates three reasons to reject the options in the passage.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that buzzers may be paid to praise products; hence, the may not tell the truth. As stated by the man, companies find people who utilize their products and like them. The buzzers like the lecturer get paid to talk about products that they like. So, consumers get the truth from buzzers. Therefore, it is a fallacious conclusion to that that buzzers mislead consumers.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that consumers believe what buzzers says, the man claims that people constantly ask a lot of questions about a products which he talks about it such as its price and services. Unless, consumers believe that the product is appropriate, they will not buy the product.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the passage that buzzing method have a harmful effect on human beings' relationships, and it spreads dishonesty among individuals, saying that if a company’s products is not good, the company will not recruit buzzers in order to promote it. Indeed, it is not true conclusion that buzzing damages people's relationships, rather buzzers help people to buy products and pave the way for being honest.
All in all, the man maintains that all of the three reasons offered in the passage is misleading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...on the other hand, not only refutes the authors assessment, but also asserts that the a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to reject the options in the passage. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a product' or simply 'products'?
Suggestion: a product; products
...constantly ask a lot of questions about a products which he talks about it such as its pri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...st. All in all, the man maintains that all of the three reasons offered in the passage is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24269005848 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.169590643275 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0438596491228 0.0723426182421 61% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0555555555556 0.0435111971325 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0321637426901 0.0277247811725 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119883040936 0.128828473217 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0350877192982 0.0370669169778 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62772107211 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0233918128655 0.0208969081088 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.137426900585 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0146198830409 0.0158828679856 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0204678362573 0.0114777025283 178% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1835.0 1645.83664459 111% => OK
No of words: 305.0 271.125827815 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01639344262 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383606557377 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301639344262 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.147540983607 0.187439937562 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111475409836 0.113142543107 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62772107211 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.0728648973 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7857142857 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5426329552 49.3711431718 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.071428571 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.878197800319 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 51.9496487119 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.54545454545 1.90840788429 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.596333939883 0.549887131256 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153472815802 0.142949733639 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0543643075951 0.0787303798458 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.672627672257 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170926441708 0.139662658121 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.289007444527 0.266732575781 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657639842136 0.103435571967 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383508685055 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101384640929 0.0530846634433 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403321402024 0.40443939384 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672542227481 0.0528353158467 127% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.