Evidently, the quality of education has always been regarded as the prerequisite of a society well-being. It has been argued that, of all methods to improve learning efficacy, professors' wage elevation is the most effective one. While I believe it cannot be applied to all cases, I tend to agree on this view based on the following concerns.
The first point to support this is that boosting faculty salaries can have an influence on their motivations. In fact, the most significant role of any professor is to involve and impart recent studies and discoveries related to their field. Not surprisingly, this goal could not be achievable if faculties have less inspiration for exploring these novelties. In fact, it seems necessary to university to divert a considerable amount of its budget for instructors' salary to boost pedagogic productivity through providing encouragement for various educational research.
Moreover, professors' lifestyle and their economic state can play a critical role in their way of teaching. Considering a situation, when a teacher assistant has to help students with their difficulties. If he has an overloaded schedule to boost a higher income, not only might his class's efficiency impair but also he cannot go over all the required material due to lack of allocated time. In brief, providing a great salary can be considered as an effective way to fulfill teachers' economic necessities which cause them to concentrate more on their main role, instead of taking up different vocations to earn the more income.
On the other side, other measures for improving the educational environment should not be overlooked. First, it is clearly perceived that the more facilities a university can offer, the more reputation can it gain based on its qualification. In fact, talented students might unconsciously tend to attend to those universities which have a well-equipped laboratory or top-notch library. In this regard, the quality of education can be boosted by intelligent leaners. Furthermore, financial incentive scheme for students like scholarship can be another strategy that indirectly helps the learning process.
From what have been discussed, increased professors' wage is certainly an applicable solution for improving the qualification of universities. As it was mentioned, not only can it inspire their motivation but also it helps them to pay attention to their main role exclusively. However, allocating budget to applause shrewd educators for applying in a specific university can also be an important factor for the improving didactic atmosphere.
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 86
- The following appeared in a letter from a department chairperson to the president of Pierce University. "Some studies conducted by Bronston College, which is also located in a small town, reveal that both male and female professors are happier living in 66
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 76
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 76
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'in brief', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219730941704 0.229887763892 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.179372197309 0.158761421928 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0919282511211 0.0866891130778 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0605381165919 0.046263068375 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0560538116592 0.0685040099705 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103139013453 0.118717715034 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0650224215247 0.0351676179071 185% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.15852738094 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0448430493274 0.0309702414327 145% => OK
Particles: 0.00224215246637 0.00188951952338 119% => OK
Determiners: 0.0919282511211 0.0887237588012 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0336322869955 0.0209618222197 160% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0112107623318 0.0139019557991 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2597.0 2387.08602151 109% => OK
No of words: 404.0 408.028673835 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.42821782178 5.86048508987 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.408415841584 0.338922669872 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.344059405941 0.251872472559 137% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.284653465347 0.174417080927 163% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.217821782178 0.112833075102 193% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.15852738094 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569306930693 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 66.8910579286 59.2087087015 113% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2631578947 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7725807677 48.84282405 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.684210526 120.699889404 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.644075263715 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 55.6690984888 45.7405998639 122% => OK
Elegance: 1.31060606061 1.45489161554 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293735721221 0.300154397459 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0655666722322 0.103427244359 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0456437007851 0.0752933317313 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496633600431 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0963741541534 0.151897553556 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108660219595 0.114077575197 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471130247115 0.0781384742642 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.272407224311 0.336927656856 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0416413082961 0.067059652881 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191422359777 0.210909579961 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426230477586 0.0618886996521 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8870967742 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.