College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
"When a person aspires for something from his whole heart, the entire soul of the world conspires to help him succeed." These famous lines from the book 'The Alchemist', touches the chord of millions of people who have endorsed the book. Surely, there is wisdom in its saying which makes me stand against the notion that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the basis of availability of jobs in that field.
To begin with, let us remember one of the most successful Indian movie of this century, '3 Idiots', in which the protagonist Aamir Khan advocates his two colleagues cum friends at the engineering college to follow their passion rather than becoming engineers only on a hunt for a secured job and societal pressure. They end up following their passion and becoming successful wildlife photographers. The success of the movie in India and abroad is credited to the subject of the film which was not looking out for success but following passion which would eventually make success run after you. In India, jobs in fields related to doctory and engineering is considered respectable and society only treats you successful if you belong to one of the two. But would Sachin Tendulkar have been as successful, if he was a doctor and not a cricketer? Would Lata Mangeshkar, the eminent Indian singer, rise to the heights she is now if he was an engineer? No doubt, these professions did not have concrete job security, but the important factor is, are you really passionate about what you do. Does that thing fires your soul. If not, no matter how great the job opportunities be in that field, you would end up not truly satisfied with your life, probably frustrated. Most probably, you won't be able to excel the field if you don't love your work. Therefore, job conditions must not be the criteria for choosing career options but passion should be.
Having said that, there might be some circumstances in life like if you have an albatross of financial responsibility around your neck, or you have got a large family to feed because of some mishap with your parents. The circumstances in life might not give you the privilege to follow your heart always. In those cases, one must dutifully respond to his responsibilities and take safe and wise options considering his large family that he would be supporting.
Therefore, I would sum up by saying that college students should not base their choice of a field of study merely on the basis of the job availability but follow the field where their passion lies, unless their life does not give them scope to do so.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | christine_cui | 54 | view |
- Five years ago, the local university built two new dormitories through different contractors. Aleph Construction and Gimmel Builders. The buildings were nearly identical, though it cost Gimmel Builders approximately 20 percent more to construct their dorm 70
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 75
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.Discuss the extent to 50
- Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing or supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons an 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir Khan advocates his two colleagues cum friends at the engineering college to fo...
^^
Line 3, column 1102, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fire'?
Suggestion: fire
...nate about what you do. Does that thing fires your soul. If not, no matter how great ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... wont be able to excel the field if you dont love your work. Therefore, job conditio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1404, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to career'
Suggestion: to career
...s must not be the criteria for choosing career options but passion should be. Havin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life might not give you the privilege to follow your heart always. In those cases...
^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...you the privilege to follow your heart always. In those cases, one must dutifully res...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'no doubt', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239919354839 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.159274193548 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0443548387097 0.0880659088768 50% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0524193548387 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0766129032258 0.0444667217837 172% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.122983870968 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0342741935484 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65936500357 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0241935483871 0.030933414821 78% => OK
Particles: 0.00806451612903 0.0016655270985 484% => OK
Determiners: 0.0947580645161 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0262096774194 0.0249443105267 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0181451612903 0.0148568991511 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2608.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 450.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79555555556 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.306666666667 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.213333333333 0.280924506359 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.144444444444 0.200843997647 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108888888889 0.132149295362 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65936500357 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542222222222 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 63.98325463 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 26.4705882353 23.380412469 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8422004004 59.4972553346 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.411764706 141.124799967 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4705882353 23.380412469 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.674092028746 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 47.8039215686 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.37762237762 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445818802615 0.391690518653 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121869976719 0.123202303941 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0751119069132 0.077325440228 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498271412848 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.216625034217 0.149214159877 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157398146929 0.161403998019 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195912847143 0.0892212321368 220% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.298732487046 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100622212724 0.0692045440612 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377501119364 0.275328986314 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198977287349 0.0653680567796 304% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.