The reading passage is about decline in the rate of reading literature books; however the professor disagrees.
The professor controverts all the arguments that have been made by the author of the reading passage; she also discredits all the points made by the author by providing some rational reasons. The reading states that the rate of reading books, especially literature books, has been declined and this phenomenon has many detrimental implications not only on individuals but also on our culture. The lecturer, on the other hand, mentions that none of the points made by the reading passage makes sense.
First and foremost, the author of the reading asserts that decline in the rate of reading novels and literature books is so critical because they contribute to our culture. Moreover, the reading passage contends that self-help books are much more popular than literature books and it is a disaster for our culture. In contrast, the lecturer opposes with this issue due to the fact that there are many books of other fields such as science, politics, and history that are beneficial for the culture, and they also can stimulate both our imagination and creativity.
Furthermore, the reading holds the view that activities such as watching TV, surfing the net, and watching a music video have been substituted for reading a good novel, and all the aforementioned activities are of a less value than reading a novel. On the contrary, the speaker argues that culture has changed. Consequently, many diverse cultural forms have been emerged such as music or movies. Either of them is culturally precious.
Eventually, the reading passage specifies that publishers have decreased their investing on literature books; as a result, writing has been declined. However, the professor disapproves and states that this issue has nothing to do with readers, so we cannot blame them. To illustrate, she states that modern novels are too elaborate to be perceived.
All in all, the professor had some reasons to refute the reading points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-14 | Vida Pashaei | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 73
- Whether hydrogen fuel-cell engines are better substitute for internal-combustion engines or not? 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...on individuals but also on our culture. The lecturer, on the other hand, mentions t...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252124645892 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.161473087819 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.070821529745 0.0723426182421 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0509915014164 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0368271954674 0.0277247811725 133% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118980169972 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0623229461756 0.0370669169778 168% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72791661678 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0169971671388 0.0208969081088 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.127478753541 0.128158765124 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0056657223796 0.0158828679856 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0056657223796 0.0114777025283 49% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1934.0 1645.83664459 118% => OK
No of words: 314.0 271.125827815 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15923566879 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382165605096 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.312101910828 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210191082803 0.187439937562 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146496815287 0.113142543107 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72791661678 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.8494349114 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4285714286 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4365637664 49.3711431718 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 132.220823453 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 53.6387625114 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.73863636364 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552699373091 0.549887131256 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125089550792 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0891247071024 0.0787303798458 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.628191912002 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.211739388547 0.139662658121 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243060428274 0.266732575781 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144525930145 0.103435571967 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.312385199853 0.414875509568 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.122833669948 0.0530846634433 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355603105289 0.40443939384 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101220325776 0.0528353158467 192% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.