In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture deal with the cane toad, which is a large amphibian species native to Central and South America. Regarding this topic, the author asserts that there are three possible ways to prevent the population of the cane toad in Australia from increasing. However, the lecturer contradicts the author’s assertion by saying that the three ways would be unsuccessful and be dangerous to the environment.
First of all, according to the lecture, it is unconvincing that building a national fence would not be able to prevent the number of the cane toad from increasing. The lecturer mentions that it is sufficiently possible that the young toads or eggs still can move to the inside of the fence, which can cause to multiply the number of the cane toad. Consequently, the way to make a national fence does not an effective way to reduce the population of the cane toad. This challenges the author’s argument that a national fence is able to ban the population of toads from spreading by giving the similar example of preventing the spread of rabbits in Australia.
Secondly, the lecture goes on to say that allowing volunteers to capture and destroy the toads is able to harm to the toads but also dangerous to other species, this is because if the volunteers are not trained, they would deconstruct frogs’ habitats, which can be dangerous to them to survive. In this regard, using volunteers to prohibit the toads from increasing does not easily to be successful without negative influences to other species. This counters the author’s view point that the method of using volunteers can be an effective way to reduce the number of the toads because they can easily capture the toads using simple traps and the young toads and their eggs are simply destroyed by the volunteers.
Lastly, the lecturer points out that it is problematic that in order to control of the population of the toads, using the virus caused a disease is useful. To be specific, the toads in Australia frequently are transported to the America by researchers or some people who want to get the toad as a pet. Thus, there is possibility that if the infected toads are transported to the America, then they would play a vital role in the collapse of the native toads, which can lead to a disaster to the eco-system in America. This rebuts the author’s claim that the population of the toads can be easily controlled by the infection from the virus invented by researchers.
- 151 Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles. A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. During those ten year 48
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Government should focus its budgets more on environmental protection than on economy.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 83
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 86
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'multiplying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: multiplying
...he inside of the fence, which can cause to multiply the number of the cane toad. Consequent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'thus', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238589211618 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.157676348548 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0622406639004 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0394190871369 0.0435111971325 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0165975103734 0.0277247811725 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114107883817 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.045643153527 0.0370669169778 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80959589564 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0580912863071 0.0208969081088 278% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00207468879668 0.00154638098197 134% => OK
Determiners: 0.151452282158 0.128158765124 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0228215767635 0.0158828679856 144% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0103734439834 0.0114777025283 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2527.0 1645.83664459 154% => OK
No of words: 430.0 271.125827815 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87674418605 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.04852973271 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.316279069767 0.374372842146 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255813953488 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.187439937562 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132558139535 0.113142543107 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80959589564 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420930232558 0.539623497131 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.4584327807 53.8517498576 84% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 30.7142857143 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.598181336 49.3711431718 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.5 132.220823453 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07142857143 0.878197800319 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 56.2956810631 50.5018328374 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.8640776699 1.90840788429 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.791962699736 0.549887131256 144% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.23712684454 0.142949733639 166% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0577960539275 0.0787303798458 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.755033900311 0.631733273073 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0548849279227 0.139662658121 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.486973691317 0.266732575781 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574206760521 0.103435571967 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.628535735615 0.414875509568 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0217800047278 0.0530846634433 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.656737829472 0.40443939384 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335259906453 0.0528353158467 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.