tpo31
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the validity of fine lines around the Sinosauropteryx's fossil is the indicator of the feather. While the reading part lists some reasons as the possible contradiction of this idea, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the text mentions to the misinterpretation among the fibers released by the decomposition of the functional skin and the feather. However, the professor challenges this fact. She states that, based on the fossils of the other animal buried at the same time with this dinosaur, the functional skin beautifully are preserved in the ash. As a result, this dinosaur's functional skin has sustained intact and without the decomposition too.
Next, meanwhile, the article posits that the line is the fossilized relic of frills than the remains of feathers, the instructor refutes this declaration. She asserts that there a fundamental chemical difference among the frill and feather. The frill contains a specific type of protein which the feather does not. Moreover, while there is no evidence of this protein's deposit in the soil; consequently, this line is not a vestige of frills.
Finally, the passage assumes that for the sake of the feather location in the backbone and the tail of the dinosaur, it did not possess the function in the flight and thermoregulation. Therefore, it would abortive and useless. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. Based on her assertion, the feather owns the other function apart from the fly and thermoregulation. For instance, the colorful feather in the tail of a specific current bird leads to attract the male. Hence, it has the display function. In addition, based on the examination, the experts find that the feathers of dinosaur were orange and white which illustrate the display function of that feathers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | noushinhaddad | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | atefehndi | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | ali.hasani1992 | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | Hamide | 70 | view |
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely alig 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 83
- tpo51 3
- tpo23 86
- working hours have something to do with our satisfaction of our live 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... are preserved in the ash. As a result, this dinosaurs functional skin has sustained...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'apart from', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272222222222 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.108333333333 0.158904122519 68% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0611111111111 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0361111111111 0.0435111971325 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0166666666667 0.0277247811725 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144444444444 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.025 0.0370669169778 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93616090412 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00833333333333 0.0208969081088 40% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.202777777778 0.128158765124 158% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00277777777778 0.0158828679856 17% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00555555555556 0.0114777025283 48% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1978.0 1645.83664459 120% => OK
No of words: 322.0 271.125827815 119% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14285714286 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350931677019 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304347826087 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223602484472 0.187439937562 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11801242236 0.113142543107 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93616090412 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537267080745 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.5120144259 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9411764706 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2976575259 49.3711431718 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.352941176 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 0.878197800319 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 49.3759590793 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.74137931034 1.90840788429 144% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.743176803518 0.549887131256 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122127094488 0.142949733639 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0626045759348 0.0787303798458 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.643118897956 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.190948155004 0.139662658121 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.377160534254 0.266732575781 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173120390473 0.103435571967 167% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.576982346613 0.414875509568 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0263199883833 0.0530846634433 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.606391850885 0.40443939384 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350971446471 0.0528353158467 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.