tpo32
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the feasible main source of the sound "quacker". While the reading part lists some reasons as the possible main causes of this phenomenon, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading section.
First of all, the article candidates the calls of male and female orca whales for the mating as one of the intimate resource of this bizarre sound. However, the instructor challenges this claim. She states that the whales are highly unlikely to produce this sound since they swim near the surface. Besides, the submarine is in the depth part of the ocean. In this condition, the submarine cannot detect the sound release by them in the water.
Next, meanwhile, the passage mentions to the giant squid which possesses a complex intelligence to emit the strange sound, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this declaration too. She asserts that although the giant squid can be considered as the best option for this incident, the sound was recognized solo for two decades- between 1960-1980- and after that period they did not hear that sound anymore. Yet, the giant squad has inhabited in the region till now. As a result, there is no cogent reason that why the giant squid emitted that sound for a specific span of time and then did not.
Finally, the text posits that the secretly patrolling by the foreign military in this region as the possible source of this sound. On the other hand, the professor refutes the feasibility of this factor. Based on her assertion, the reporter of sound indicated that the sound moves fast; on contrast, there is no any submarine to be capable of quick movement. In addition, whole submarines emit engine sound; however, there was no report about this sound with the quacker. Moreover, inasmuch as they do not have this technology to build a submarine with that speed and silence, the option of the foreign submarines automatically is eliminated.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past young people depended on their parents for making decisions. Today, young people are better able to make decisions on their own. 70
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- sop 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Programs made in one's own country are more interesting than those made in other countries. 80
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'complex intelligence'.
Suggestion: complex intelligence
...ions to the giant squid which possesses a complex intelligence to emit the strange sound, the professo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...sound moves fast; on contrast, there is no any submarine to be capable of quick mo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256476683938 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.10621761658 0.158904122519 67% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0777202072539 0.0723426182421 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0466321243523 0.0435111971325 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0181347150259 0.0277247811725 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145077720207 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0181347150259 0.0370669169778 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.60198598037 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0155440414508 0.0208969081088 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.181347150259 0.128158765124 142% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00518134715026 0.0158828679856 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00777202072539 0.0114777025283 68% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2039.0 1645.83664459 124% => OK
No of words: 342.0 271.125827815 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96198830409 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336257309942 0.374372842146 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.248538011696 0.287516216867 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19298245614 0.187439937562 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105263157895 0.113142543107 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60198598037 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540935672515 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 58.2755880283 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.375 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0232550269 49.3711431718 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4375 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 46.2288011696 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 2.45454545455 1.90840788429 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.66160148535 0.549887131256 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125782159005 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0567434355322 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.638332207819 0.631733273073 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108131217854 0.139662658121 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.347130438696 0.266732575781 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874329689801 0.103435571967 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.562892473963 0.414875509568 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0100728452914 0.0530846634433 19% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.529030371595 0.40443939384 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513979885705 0.0528353158467 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.