The reading and lecture discussing about clay copper jar as electric batteries but in very contrasts ways.
Firstly, reading passage says that if, ancient used the copper jar generate the power there should be conductors like wire must be there, but they did not find out any kind of materials like that. The lecturer refutes this point by stating that local people found these jars so they might not know the value of wires, that might be thrown the that wires. Further they are not archaeologist.
Secondly, reading passage suggests that ancient people might be used it for scrolling the text because they found the same size of jar in Seleucia which very popular area in the ancient time. But the speaker contrasts this point by stating that by using the iron and copper they might had produced the power and they used to it varies purpose rather than scrolling because presence of iron is evidence for that.
Thirdly, reading passage explains that if, the ancient people used these copper jars for produce electricity then there must be generator but there is no proof for that. Still, the speaker opposes this point by explaining that they may be used the power for purposes like magic and mysterious things by it's shock sensation. Further the ancient doctors might used it for healing of diseases.
To sum up, according to reading passage copper jars not used as batteries because there is no wire, all the jars are same size and there no proof for the generator but the professor refuses all these points by giving some logical evidence that says that the ancient people might be used it as batteries.
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 80
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 70
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 76
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 76
- Some people believe that success in life comes from taking risks or chances. Others believe that success results from careful planning. In your opinion, what does success come from? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ker contrasts this point by stating that by using the iron and copper they might ...
^^
Line 6, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...copper they might had produced the power and they used to it varies purpose rathe...
^^
Line 9, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Thirdly, reading passage explains that if, the ancient people used these copper...
^^
Line 11, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t people might be used it as batteries.
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'kind of', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228187919463 0.261695866417 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.184563758389 0.158904122519 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0469798657718 0.0723426182421 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0503355704698 0.0435111971325 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0402684563758 0.0277247811725 145% => OK
Prepositions: 0.144295302013 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0738255033557 0.0370669169778 199% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.21564338674 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.010067114094 0.0208969081088 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00671140939597 0.00154638098197 434% => OK
Determiners: 0.11744966443 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0335570469799 0.0158828679856 211% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010067114094 0.0114777025283 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1634.0 1645.83664459 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 271.125827815 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87769784173 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31654676259 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244604316547 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.122302158273 0.187439937562 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0755395683453 0.113142543107 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21564338674 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453237410072 0.539623497131 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.7730418236 53.8517498576 79% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 27.8 21.7502111507 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6444974866 49.3711431718 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.4 132.220823453 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 21.7502111507 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 0.878197800319 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 52.2604316547 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.62195121951 1.90840788429 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57869524781 0.549887131256 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125095235067 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0525207527519 0.0787303798458 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.707435787493 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.211628160458 0.139662658121 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.301022017775 0.266732575781 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102981634987 0.103435571967 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375094531779 0.414875509568 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.155420787595 0.0530846634433 293% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.400484151424 0.40443939384 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847654521997 0.0528353158467 160% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.