The reading passage and the lecture discussing about whether Robert E Peary reached the north pole or not but in very contrast manner.
Firstly, reading suggests that Peary may be reached the north pole because the National Geographical carefully reviewed his records and documents which stats thath he reached the north pole. But, the lecturer argues that investigations are not done properly because he was funded by his friend who was working in that team. So because of his bias they declared that Peary reached north pole, further, giving report within two day which make more doubts.
Secondly, reading claims that Peary arrived at Ellesmere island within 37 days and one of the person name Avery also did the same thing less than 37 day to reach the green land it shows that it possible for Peary to reach the north pole. Again, the speaker refuses this statement by saying that Avery did not carry any food, moreover, he got the food from the flight during the dogsled rides. So this is entirely different in Peary case.
Thirdly, reading explains that surf position to the sun in his photographs shows that he taken the photos in north pole and so he reached there. Still, the professor opposes this statement by contrasting that photos which he taken is somewhere around 100 years old and it is fade every spot, and camera also very old model. So, we must not count this surf position to the sun because it gives wrong measurements.
To sum up, The reading suggests that Peary might be gone to the north pole because National Geographic assured his work, Avery travelling time to green land similar to Peary and surf position to sun in the photos but the speaker refutes all these statements with reasonable logical evidences and arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er refuses this statement by saying that Avery did not carry any food, moreover, ...
^^
Line 10, column 90, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'took'?
Suggestion: took
...he sun in his photographs shows that he taken the photos in north pole and so he reac...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o he reached there. Still, the professor opposes this statement by contrasting th...
^^
Line 10, column 227, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'took'?
Suggestion: took
...ent by contrasting that photos which he taken is somewhere around 100 years old and i...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onable logical evidences and arguments.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'thirdly', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248466257669 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.159509202454 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0736196319018 0.0723426182421 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0705521472393 0.0435111971325 162% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0521472392638 0.0277247811725 188% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113496932515 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0460122699387 0.0370669169778 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.31091244578 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0276073619632 0.0208969081088 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00306748466258 0.00154638098197 198% => OK
Determiners: 0.0950920245399 0.128158765124 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00920245398773 0.0158828679856 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0153374233129 0.0114777025283 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1777.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 301.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90365448505 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.318936877076 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.239202657807 0.287516216867 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132890365449 0.187439937562 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0730897009967 0.113142543107 65% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31091244578 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544850498339 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.4430840343 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 27.3636363636 21.7502111507 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3180476899 49.3711431718 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.545454545 132.220823453 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 21.7502111507 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.27272727273 0.878197800319 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 51.2839021444 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.44565217391 1.90840788429 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.726184387663 0.549887131256 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.138690948554 0.142949733639 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0694967446606 0.0787303798458 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.66014660289 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.214577429186 0.139662658121 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.338194639381 0.266732575781 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158548636153 0.103435571967 153% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328724818412 0.414875509568 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0223320909468 0.0530846634433 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.4939441178 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065598892616 0.0528353158467 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.