Both the reading and listening focus on the same topic about various agnostids living theories, but they subscribe two different viewpoints. While the reading tries to explain three possible theories about living of these marine animals, the listening puts forward very convincing arguments to rule out these theories.
First, according to the article, it is highly possible that agnostids likes other primitive arthropods were free-swimming predators. However, the professor refutes that by saying the fact that free-swimming predators often have big eyes with a very good visionary, but agnostids had poor eye-sight or were almost blind. In addition, there is not any evidence showing predatory ability in them such as existence of an organ helping them to haunt.
Second, the text indicates that agnostids might have been lived on the seafloor in a similar way that some arthropods have dwelled there. Conversely, the speaker argues that the important characteristic of seafloor dwellers is moving slowly and living in a local region, but surprisingly agnostids lived in many remote areas which indicates that they were fast moving insects. Thus, this theory cannot be validated by the argument written in the text.
Third, the reading passage points out that these tiny animals may be parasites which lived on primitive fish or on other larger arthropods. Nevertheless, the lecturer casts doubt on it by referring the audience to the data showing vast population of the agnostids which is in direct contrast to parasites’.
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 86
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and listening focus on ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rguments to rule out these theories. First, according to the article, it is h...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of an organ helping them to haunt. Second, the text indicates that agnostid...
^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s might have been lived on the seafloor in a similar way that some arthropods have dwelled there...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by the argument written in the text. Third, the reading passage points out th...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224719101124 0.261695866417 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.168539325843 0.158904122519 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112359550562 0.0723426182421 155% => OK
Adverbs: 0.059925093633 0.0435111971325 138% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0224719101124 0.0277247811725 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123595505618 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.059925093633 0.0370669169778 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81217282048 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0224719101124 0.0208969081088 108% => OK
Particles: 0.00374531835206 0.00154638098197 242% => OK
Determiners: 0.10861423221 0.128158765124 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0112359550562 0.0158828679856 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0112359550562 0.0114777025283 98% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1549.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 240.0 271.125827815 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.45416666667 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4125 0.374372842146 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320833333333 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241666666667 0.187439937562 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179166666667 0.113142543107 158% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81217282048 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629166666667 0.539623497131 117% => OK
Word variations: 67.5285802179 53.8517498576 125% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5037347717 49.3711431718 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.9 132.220823453 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 0.878197800319 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 56.0833333333 50.5018328374 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.62686567164 1.90840788429 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.663983689825 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131076468136 0.142949733639 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0787311836934 0.0787303798458 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.642492315981 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116482462968 0.139662658121 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.28988703408 0.266732575781 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109216670932 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.263192685662 0.414875509568 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0865677380912 0.0530846634433 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.421016821197 0.40443939384 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100182803797 0.0528353158467 190% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.