Students in campus are always required to complete various types of assignments, with which I regard the group project as the most beneficial one. It's commonly believed that working together on a group project helps improve students learning efficiency than working alone. I couldn't agree more with this belief and I will explore some of essential aspects of the benefits as follows.
First and foremost, students working together on a group project can always have brainstorms, which speed up the process of problem-solving. This advantage is mostly obvious when you encounter a problem. As is known to all that different people have different minds, and they hold various perspectives over a specific problem. Therefore, people in the group are more likely to spot the points that are over sighted by others, which greatly improve the problem-solving efficiency.
On the other hand, students getting together on a project can learn from each other, which can help expand their sight of view. This benefit is easy to understand since different people specialize in different fields, and the knowledge of that field can compensate for the others' lacking of that kind of knowledge. A simple example will suffice to illustrate my viewpoint. I'm fortunate to have a double bachelor in accounting. And in this class, students are coming from different majors, ranging from environmental science to electronic engineering. During some of the courses, we are instructed to form several groups to do a large project. At one time, we were required to build up a virtual company specializing in environment improvement and came out with a rough plan, as well as a financial arrangement to prove its feasibility. At this project, we had some group members to select the most critical environmental problem and analyze it. While members from electronic engineering could provide the technology support and design a device to tackle the problem. I myself was from the faculty of life of science, and I took charge of monitoring the possible effects that might pose on the local species. Our project went on successfully; with everyone could make themselves useful. And during this process, we were fortunate to have the chance to have a quick look at other fields, which really broadened our knowledge scope
.
Last but not least, working in the group can help students to develop various skills based on their roles. As we know, a group can be composed of group leader and group member. And students belonging to different groups can practice different skills. Take the leader, for instance, a group leader is supposed to be decisive and be able to oversight the whole project, while at the same time to assign assignments to members. Being a leader is undoubtedly tough but it would really cultivate one’s potential to become a real leader. On the other hand, being a member should learn to follow the instruction from the leader, learn to obey while at the same time vocal different ideas if you find another way to solve the problem. This experience can also allow students to practice communities’ skills, learn ability, too
In conclusion, it is much more beneficial to work together on a group project than work alone since it helps the students to gain more knowledge, and skills
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
'On the other hand' means 'However'. It doesn't mean 'On another hand'. You may use 'In addition'
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 544 350
No. of Characters: 2674 1500
No. of Different Words: 262 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.829 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.915 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.686 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 199 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 148 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.148 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.291 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.481 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.277 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.449 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Students in campus are always required t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...arning efficiency than working alone. I couldnt agree more with this belief and I will ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al aspects of the benefits as follows. First and foremost, students working...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rove the problem-solving efficiency. On the other hand, students getting toge...
^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ill suffice to illustrate my viewpoint. Im fortunate to have a double bachelor in ...
^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ience to electronic engineering. During some of the courses, we are instructed to form seve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1434, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ch really broadened our knowledge scope . Last but not least, working in th...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eally broadened our knowledge scope . Last but not least, working in the group...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies' skills, learn ability, too In conclusion, it is much more beneficia...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230132450331 0.229887763892 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.158940397351 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0860927152318 0.0866891130778 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0480132450331 0.046263068375 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0430463576159 0.0685040099705 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109271523179 0.118717715034 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0364238410596 0.0351676179071 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81995839431 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.046357615894 0.0309702414327 150% => OK
Particles: 0.00496688741722 0.00188951952338 263% => OK
Determiners: 0.102649006623 0.0887237588012 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0248344370861 0.0209618222197 118% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0149006622517 0.0139019557991 107% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3317.0 2387.08602151 139% => OK
No of words: 543.0 408.028673835 133% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10865561694 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379373848987 0.338922669872 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29650092081 0.251872472559 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198895027624 0.174417080927 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.117863720074 0.112833075102 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81995839431 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500920810313 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 60.4541956872 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8846153846 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3329949658 48.84282405 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.576923077 120.699889404 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8846153846 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.576923076923 0.644075263715 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.54480286738 162% => OK
Readability: 50.5347074656 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.50331125828 1.45489161554 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271344331697 0.300154397459 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0800660555616 0.103427244359 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0452859419958 0.0752933317313 60% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.453405851944 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169263779224 0.151897553556 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933046777343 0.114077575197 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606886552728 0.0781384742642 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.379900567028 0.336927656856 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0803775471991 0.067059652881 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202711044483 0.210909579961 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369798301697 0.0618886996521 60% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.