The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.
The bar graph provides information about how many people acquired a landline telephone in different countries throughout the year of 2000 to 2004.
The landline phone ownership in 9 distinctive countries show 3 different fluctuations; the decreasing trend for Singapore, Brunei and Philippines with the first two countries have the highest phone ownership, completely disappearance of phone ownership for Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Thailand, and the incremental trend for Cambodia and Vietnam. Except for Singapore and Brunei, the number of phone ownership was minimal for the rest of countries.
Looking at the detail, Singapore had the highest landline phone ownership of 450,000 in 2000. After that the figure decreased substantially but remained at its dominant figure at about 425,000 by 2004 and which trend is followed by Brunei of started at 250,000 in 2000 and ended at 225,000. In comparison to that, about 100,000 Philippines held landline phones in 2000 and declined steadily to approximately 70,000 by 2004.
Meanwhile, the rest of countries had the minimal number of people had the possession of landline phones throughout the periods. Cambodian and Vietnam people experienced an incremental trend to reach at 50,000 each by 2004, whereas Indonesian, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Thailand saw the completely extinction of landline phone ownership from the highest number recorded for Thai people of 100,000 in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | sivasankar | 73 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of th 67
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise pollution and airport construction One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights often to holiday destinations Some people might say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by t 74
- Shopping is dangerous because it makes people selfish and careless with money. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'except for']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.301652892562 0.268076937826 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.0909090909091 0.116061578633 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0702479338843 0.0759168565197 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0247933884298 0.0366838410393 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00413223140496 0.0131127313244 32% => OK
Prepositions: 0.177685950413 0.155750635184 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0247933884298 0.0379272487307 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94177508701 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0165289256198 0.0210936926555 78% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0909090909091 0.0948980150116 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00826446280992 0.00967000014798 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1432.0 1161.00487805 123% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.9 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.47963800905 5.90752243213 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73763899035 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.429864253394 0.337110787985 128% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.357466063348 0.247514529752 144% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.276018099548 0.171178102325 161% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.190045248869 0.112407865282 169% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94177508701 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.546246751206 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.0889389679 49.3433353143 93% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 27.625 23.0094962315 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.1585836836 42.9750493124 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.0 135.714022679 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 23.0094962315 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 63.3716063348 47.7609492067 133% => OK
Elegance: 4.20689655172 2.94281807926 143% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333624797575 0.418131533498 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.249123216497 0.181151798455 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.128520469499 0.0850326197045 151% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.778762486276 0.706616315825 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144950822349 0.157042692854 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211207869979 0.228904883108 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101098999842 0.108899403657 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.284373800229 0.367819155151 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0856287222414 0.0812612215331 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262849181354 0.316326947829 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834139424651 0.0921553760075 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.