People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
It is debatable whether people should exert dangerous actions only after they have premeditated its consequences. To create the most ideal outcome, it is desirable for people to ponder deeply before they undertake risky actions.
To begin with, people ought to undertake dangerous actions after careful consideration of their results. It is because making a risky decision without prudence can breed detriments and even exacerbate current situation. People have higher tendency to make decisions with myopic perspectives and narrow-mindedness when they are about to make risky decisions. Thus, premeditation and serious discussions about the consequence before engaging in dangerous action is required to prevent worsening the situation. Enron Scandal is a pellucid example of this argument. Enron was one of the most successful American energy company before it went downhill with failed deals and projects. The company eventually had to declare bankruptcy; however, executives of the company denied to do so since they were only interested in retaining their immediate fame and wealth. Consequently, the company's subterfuge was revealed, thereby being charged with even more debt and recovery was impossible at that point. Had executives of Enron speculated comprehensively of probable consequences of their risky decisions, which was not to declare bankruptcy, their company might have had better chance to recover from damage.
Moreover, people should engage in risky actions only after having ruminated about possible consequences. Undertaking dangerous actions without consideration could yield negative outcomes, even if it is unintended. A certain demeanor may not seem so harmful at first glance, but one has to look deeper and further to realize that such action could actually yield deleterious impacts. Take a renowned Psychology study of Little Albert as an example. The study utilized a baby named Albert as a participant, and successfully showed that fear and phobia could be learned. Besides its successful outcome, researchers could not predict the harm exerted on the baby Albert. He had to suffer from his learned phobia for the rest of his life. Researchers lacked intensive consideration of all risky aspects of the study, therefore failing to anticipate possible detriments of the study. Had researchers pondered deeply about the possible detriments the study could engender, they would have come up with other methods to prove their hypothesis instead of risking one's life. Therefore, careful consideration of an outcome before undertaking risky actions is indispensable.
Admittedly, some impulsive risky actions are conducive to amelioration of a society. Excessive consideration, sometimes, could work as a hindrance in advancing quality of life. Also, careful consideration could seem meaningless since humans are not capable of accurately predicting the future. Nevertheless, analyzing the situation and thinking comprehensively about pros and cons of undertaking actions, especially risky ones, surely enhance the possibility of reducing and preventing unnecessary harms, thus aiding in betterment of a society.
All in all, it is desirable if risky decisions are made after rumination of the results. Aforementioned instances cogently illustrate that there is higher possibility of occurrence of negative outcomes if dangerous decisions are made without intensive analysis of possible consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Shams Tarek | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | shahryar2222 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mussob34 | 16 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | kimmj0501 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | helxing | 54 | view |
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 60
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reas 75
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 55
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 81
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 72
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The argument 1 and argument 2 are somehow duplicated. For any GRE issue essays, better to consider the arguments on TLPE:
T means Time: if People undertake risky action, it will have bad results as time goes by. It is not on time A, it will be on time B. So they should carefully consider its consequences.
L means Location: People undertake risky action on another country with good result, however, in this country, it may have bad result.
P means People: it depends on people who are doing the risky action.
E means Event : however, in emergency Event , try the best to lead the damage to minimum.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 507 350
No. of Characters: 2867 1500
No. of Different Words: 263 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.745 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.655 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.047 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 233 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 188 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 131 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 99 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.391 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.519 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.273 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.455 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'denied doing'.
Suggestion: denied doing
...tcy; however, executives of the company denied to do so since they were only interested in r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1055, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ove their hypothesis instead of risking ones life. Therefore, careful consideration ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'as to', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2375 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.169642857143 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114285714286 0.0880659088768 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0642857142857 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375 0.0444667217837 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128571428571 0.12292977631 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0517857142857 0.0406280797675 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.12768151897 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0303571428571 0.030933414821 98% => OK
Particles: 0.00178571428571 0.0016655270985 107% => OK
Determiners: 0.0642857142857 0.0997080785238 64% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.025 0.0249443105267 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00357142857143 0.0148568991511 24% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3443.0 2732.02544248 126% => OK
No of words: 507.0 452.878318584 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.7909270217 6.0361032391 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.467455621302 0.366273622748 128% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.38067061144 0.280924506359 136% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.282051282051 0.200843997647 140% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.205128205128 0.132149295362 155% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12768151897 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 219.290929204 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534516765286 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 64.9975284998 55.4138127331 117% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7777777778 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0185147925 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.518518519 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.62962962963 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 56.8448389218 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.53947368421 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157907984415 0.391690518653 40% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0970496070059 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0775427859284 0.077325440228 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.442044951869 0.547984918172 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163266996461 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587206479741 0.161403998019 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888270264829 0.0892212321368 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.326377064909 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0637946070769 0.0692045440612 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129172806546 0.275328986314 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111471833529 0.0653680567796 171% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 5.30420353982 358% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 12.0 3.66592920354 327% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.