Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
It is debatable whether society ought to attempt to prevent extinction of species only if extinction of those species is due to human activities. Although, humans are the only species with intellect and conscience, it would be most effective if humans take responsibility for those species that are endangered as a result of human activities.
To begin with, it is most efficient when humans try to save endangered species only if human activities are the cause; otherwise, it would require too much time and energy. It is incontrovertible that humans are responsible for the adverse results engendered from human societies. Industrialization, nuclear energy, and wars have truly had detriments on many other species. However, humans should strategize well about saving endangered species and target those that are affected mainly from humans. It is crucial to plan since humans have to care for other problems as well. Ther is a lot of urgent situations that require extensive attention such as ISIS terror, murder incidents, and gun terror issues. These incidents create human victims, which should be the primary target for a society to care for. Had there been limitless amount of resources, societies would be able to save all the endangered species and care for human society as well. However, since resources are limited, there needs a plan, which inevitably makes humans to choose to select which species to save.
Moreover, even though human conscience tells that society should make efforts to save every endangered species, it is simply an impossible task. Nature has its own rules and humans have to accept and submit to it. The thought that humans could prevent every extinction is a very arrogant thought, and simply improbable as well. By the law of nature, some species are dying off while other species are created and survived. Humans suggested a lot of theories like survival of the fittest and natural selection; nevertheless, such phenomena is out of human realm. Although humans could have some impact to those species that are affected primarily by human activities, it would be very arduous for humans go against the nature's law to recover other species.
Admittedly, one can argue that there is a chain effect and everything is related. Even seemingly innocuous human activities could be deleterious to some species. However, then there will be no advancement as well. Humans eventually have to choose the most effective option, and there will be opportunity cost in every choice. And, it is most effective if humans target those species that directly affected by human activities.
All in all, because of aforementioned reasons, humans should attempt to prevent extinction of species that are endangered mainly due to human activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 63
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one 69
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years a recent survey of video game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed The survey asked v 82
- The following appeared in the editorial column of the Fern County Gazette newspaper:"The Fern County Council made the right decision when it unanimously voted to convert the Northside branch of the county library system into a computer-skills training fac 70
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 81
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: However, humans should strategize well about saving endangered species and target those that are affected mainly from humans.
Error: strategize Suggestion: No alternate word
-------------
arguments: OK
-------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 445 while No. of Different Words: 196
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 445 350
No. of Characters: 2263 1500
No. of Different Words: 196 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.593 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.085 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.686 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 174 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 124 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.348 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.99 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.504 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'natures'' or 'nature's'?
Suggestion: natures'; nature's
... very arduous for humans go against the natures law to recover other species. Admit...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219758064516 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.16935483871 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104838709677 0.0880659088768 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0766129032258 0.0497285424764 154% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0221774193548 0.0444667217837 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100806451613 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0302419354839 0.0406280797675 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77978163915 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0423387096774 0.030933414821 137% => OK
Particles: 0.00201612903226 0.0016655270985 121% => OK
Determiners: 0.0645161290323 0.0997080785238 65% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0302419354839 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0221774193548 0.0148568991511 149% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2774.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 445.0 452.878318584 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23370786517 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395505617978 0.366273622748 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.296629213483 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188764044944 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141573033708 0.132149295362 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77978163915 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 219.290929204 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467415730337 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 51.8844458003 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.347826087 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.511132563 59.4972553346 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.608695652 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.347826087 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.478260869565 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 49.0107474353 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.30827067669 1.64882698954 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388139040355 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110297647187 0.123202303941 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0929748334987 0.077325440228 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.484538553343 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.16264185496 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148761901636 0.161403998019 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774842321167 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.395127428287 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.147591243844 0.0692045440612 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280820538621 0.275328986314 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793794440401 0.0653680567796 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 15.0 7.22455752212 208% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.