The chart shows a percentage of live births by age of mother for UK and non-UK born mothers, 2015
The chart represents the proportion of live births by mothers who were born in UK or non-UK born in 7 different age groups in 2015.
Overall, the proportion of live births was higher for non-UK mothers than that of UK mothers. It is interesting to note that, UK mothers preferred to have a live birth at an early age, whereas non-UK mothers had a live birth at a later age. Around 25 to 29 of age, both mothers experienced the same percentage of live births.
Looking in details, UK mothers had the highest live births in ages of 30 to 34 of about 30%, followed by age of 25 to 29 of about 30%. It is noticeable that, UK mothers had the higher live births rates at the age of 20 to 24 of around 18% in opposed to 10% for non-UK mothers’ live birth rates. The rest of ages had the minimal live birth rates.
Meanwhile, non-UK mothers also experienced the highest live births in ages of 30 to 34 of around 35%, followed by age of 25 to 29 of about 29%. However, at the age of 35 to 39, non-UK mother showed the higher live births rates of 20% compared to UK mothers (approximately 15%). The rest of ages had the minimal live birth rates.
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- There are plenty of options available for spreading news such as newspapers radio TV Internet and so on According to your opinion what is the best media to use Why 80
- In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 73
- The pie chart below shows the methods of booked for English courses by international students in three different countries in 2009 and in 2010. 64
- Nowadays people live in societies that consumer goods have become cheaper Do you think the advantages of consumer goods being cheaper outweigh the disadvantages 84
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256 0.268076937826 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.096 0.116061578633 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12 0.0759168565197 158% => OK
Adverbs: 0.036 0.0366838410393 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.008 0.0131127313244 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16 0.155750635184 103% => OK
Participles: 0.032 0.0379272487307 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4290799198 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.044 0.0210936926555 209% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.08 0.0948980150116 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.004 0.00967000014798 41% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1141.0 1161.00487805 98% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.9 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23394495413 5.90752243213 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73763899035 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.279816513761 0.337110787985 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.169724770642 0.247514529752 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0917431192661 0.171178102325 54% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0596330275229 0.112407865282 53% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4290799198 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403669724771 0.546246751206 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 34.5824221989 49.3433353143 70% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0642877248 42.9750493124 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 135.714022679 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.689975730869 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 38.7724770642 47.7609492067 81% => OK
Elegance: 3.2 2.94281807926 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.587705613074 0.418131533498 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.248617442316 0.181151798455 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0604130883906 0.0850326197045 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.729959779804 0.706616315825 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135563332953 0.157042692854 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.340101324455 0.228904883108 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105344000335 0.108899403657 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.589029839325 0.367819155151 160% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.207844300096 0.0812612215331 256% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.462166710527 0.316326947829 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025709609434 0.0921553760075 28% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.08536585366 220% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 3.02926829268 297% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.