The chart shows a percentage of live births by age of mother for UK and non-UK born mothers, 2015
The chart represents the proportion of live births by mothers who were born in UK or non-UK born in 7 different age groups in 2015.
Overall, the proportion of live births was higher for non-UK mothers than that of UK mothers. It is interesting to note that, UK mothers preferred to have a live birth at an early age, whereas non-UK mothers had a live birth at a later age. Around 25 to 29 of age, both mothers experienced the same percentage of live births.
Looking in details, UK mothers had the highest live births in ages of 30 to 34 of about 30%, followed by age of 25 to 29 of about 30%. It is noticeable that, UK mothers had the higher live births rates at the age of 20 to 24 of around 18% which rates were similar to mothers’ age of 35 to 39. The rest of ages had the minimal live birth rates.
Meanwhile, non-UK mothers also experienced the highest live births in ages of 30 to 34 of around 35%, followed by age of 25 to 29 of about 29% and by 35 to 39 years old had recorded at 20% of live births. The rest of ages had the minimal live birth rates.
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this, decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be ma 73
- For decades, space has inspired the human imagination. There are many who feel that space travel is a waste of time and resources, yet others believe that it brings many benefits to society. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- As a part of education, students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245762711864 0.268076937826 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.101694915254 0.116061578633 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.118644067797 0.0759168565197 156% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0296610169492 0.0366838410393 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00847457627119 0.0131127313244 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.165254237288 0.155750635184 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0296610169492 0.0379272487307 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37052248371 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0466101694915 0.0210936926555 221% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0762711864407 0.0948980150116 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00847457627119 0.00967000014798 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1066.0 1161.00487805 92% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.9 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1004784689 5.90752243213 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.248803827751 0.337110787985 74% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.167464114833 0.247514529752 68% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0861244019139 0.171178102325 50% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0574162679426 0.112407865282 51% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37052248371 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416267942584 0.546246751206 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 35.1682430524 49.3433353143 71% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.2222222222 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9476919089 42.9750493124 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 135.714022679 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.689975730869 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 39.9686337055 47.7609492067 84% => OK
Elegance: 3.15151515152 2.94281807926 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.563925389706 0.418131533498 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.23981003275 0.181151798455 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0520396853157 0.0850326197045 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.732977852366 0.706616315825 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158353520869 0.157042692854 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.324621441062 0.228904883108 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107224180589 0.108899403657 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.575770361307 0.367819155151 157% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.204301684852 0.0812612215331 251% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.436331791167 0.316326947829 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045599006088 0.0921553760075 49% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.08536585366 196% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.02926829268 264% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.