Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The policy mentioned urges for a regular check on the employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce any wastage of time by their employees and also it precludes any waste of memory of the system. It may also have another benign impact of protection from any law suits. I agree with the author in so far, but it may leak any private information of the employee and harm them.
The monitoring over the accounts of the employee is although not sufficient to preserve the resources. As, email boxes may not provide all of the information. It requires meticulous steps to have a check upon them. Along with emails, the information in the system may also contain some not so important information. Only information that is germane should be allowed in their respective systems. This could save the memory capacity of the system.
The employees may not be wasting resources, but it may happen that they can supply some confidential information to other competing firms. These employees who are accomplice in any deleterious act, would be easily captured by this monitoring. The policy can be more effective if it is conducted secretly. Not allowing employees to know about this policy would give a perfect outcome with can be trusted.
However, any information which is private and confidential to the employee may be prone to get leaked. Many mendacious people can fake out through any resource like their identity cards or bank account numbers. The management should be solicitous about these cases. Every e-mail should be monitored thoroughly without saving any of their information. This would create a transparency and the employee would feel a sense of trust upon the company.
Implementation of any such policy would ensure that the company is free from lawsuits or any reprehensible employee. The environment would be more reliable and will create a better place than before.
To sum up, the policy would give an assurance that the company is free from any wastage of resources such as time. It would provide a more auspicious milieu to work. The company must take extra efforts to save any information regarding the employee's privacy. The policy will not defeat its purpose unless it spreads any correspondence after monitoring. But, it will surly serve it purpose of reducing resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect from law suits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Good teachers set challenging tasks for their students. 70
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 58
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: LAWSUIT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lawsuits'?
Suggestion: lawsuits
...er benign impact of protection from any law suits. I agree with the author in so far, but...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t sufficient to preserve the resources. As, email boxes may not provide all of the...
^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ources. As, email boxes may not provide all of the information. It requires meticulous ste...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... other competing firms. These employees who are accomplice in any deleterious act, woul...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...s to save any information regarding the employees privacy. The policy will not defeat its...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 382, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'purposes'?
Suggestion: purposes
...monitoring. But, it will surly serve it purpose of reducing resources such as time and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 470, Rule ID: LAWSUIT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lawsuits'?
Suggestion: lawsuits
...ystem capacity, as well as protect from law suits.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'such as', 'as well as', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224299065421 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.147196261682 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0677570093458 0.0880659088768 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0584112149533 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0443925233645 0.0444667217837 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114485981308 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0303738317757 0.0406280797675 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79439364807 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0210280373832 0.030933414821 68% => OK
Particles: 0.00467289719626 0.0016655270985 281% => OK
Determiners: 0.140186915888 0.0997080785238 141% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0654205607477 0.0249443105267 262% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00467289719626 0.0148568991511 31% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2382.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 393.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06106870229 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358778625954 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269720101781 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193384223919 0.200843997647 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134860050891 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79439364807 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501272264631 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 54.6065033294 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.1153846154 23.380412469 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3933798857 59.4972553346 41% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6153846154 141.124799967 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1153846154 23.380412469 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.423076923077 0.674092028746 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 42.0873947935 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.47663551402 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406351708337 0.391690518653 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0814778219671 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0655232191594 0.077325440228 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.492351150374 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132305412827 0.149214159877 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130555662469 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108928940191 0.0892212321368 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.329106716099 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0555304854116 0.0692045440612 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242060131467 0.275328986314 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113941902299 0.0653680567796 174% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.