Tpo46
In set of material, the reading passage states that the United States should store medical records in electronic databases instead of paper, then the reading provides three advantages from this method and support them, however the lecture find all reasons uncertain and proposes some evidence to refute these arguments. In fact the information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading.
First, the reading claims that using electronic databases for saving medical record can dwindle costs like transferring, copying, faxing and a lot of papers and so on, in contrast the lecture believes that after advent of electronic databases the doctors who are used to writing in paper, in beside electronic approach, will continue their old approach either, because they want to have background for themselves; hence any cost will not be reduced.
Second, the author of reading declares that electronic databases can prevent from creating mistakes as awkward handwriting or improper transcription and like that, on the contrary the professor argues that again the same doctors who are used to writing on paper, will store medical records in paper in work time, and their assistances will enter these records later; consequently the errors can get worst and even more.
Third, the reading contends that electronic databases are a great choice for researching and their researches, because access to paper records is often impossible and expensive, conversely the lecture expresses that access to electronic databases is privacy too and researchers need to spend a lot of time to pass from strict rules of United States' government, in fact it is a complex procedure. They have to obtain permission from doctors, and even they are forced to get permission from patients and sometimes the patients are not inclined to help them to any reasons.
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- tpo40 82
- do you agree or disagree? people nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past or not. 76
- do you agree or disagree? one can learn about a person from the types of friends this person has. 90
- DO you agree or disagree If a student is having difficulty studying a course it is better for the student to turn to a friend who is good at this course than to turn to his teacher for help 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
In set of material,
In this set of material,
In a set of material,
however the lecture find all reasons uncertain
however the lecture finds all reasons uncertain
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 12
No. of Words: 295 250
No. of Characters: 1532 1200
No. of Different Words: 154 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.144 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.193 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.627 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 121 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 49.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 20.956 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.5 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.811 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260869565217 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.164596273292 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0714285714286 0.0723426182421 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0527950310559 0.0435111971325 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0310559006211 0.0277247811725 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124223602484 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0465838509317 0.0370669169778 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69342032942 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0372670807453 0.0208969081088 178% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0962732919255 0.128158765124 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0248447204969 0.0158828679856 156% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00931677018634 0.0114777025283 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1864.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 295.0 271.125827815 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3186440678 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.430508474576 0.374372842146 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.328813559322 0.287516216867 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216949152542 0.187439937562 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138983050847 0.113142543107 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69342032942 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 55.6581119191 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 49.1666666667 21.7502111507 226% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 131.637971557 49.3711431718 267% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 310.666666667 132.220823453 235% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.1666666667 21.7502111507 226% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.0 0.878197800319 228% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 82.0480225989 50.5018328374 162% => OK
Elegance: 1.7375 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.61686548247 0.549887131256 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.244068713884 0.142949733639 171% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0739634928395 0.0787303798458 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.85147722018 0.631733273073 135% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128645177452 0.139662658121 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.362576623181 0.266732575781 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989172004675 0.103435571967 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.364960458022 0.414875509568 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0384184164635 0.0530846634433 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.436605786975 0.40443939384 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024232052238 0.0528353158467 46% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 5.0 10.2958057395 49% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.