As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology is an ace for human race, as it is turning out to change people's life drastically. New technology and scientific advancements are making lives of humans easier day-by-day solving our problems, increasing comforts and facilities. In my opinion, the author's assertion is relatively extreme stating that technology persists a negative effect on humans, it deteriorates their ability to think for themselves. I am in a partial disagreement to the author's point of view.
We are living in a fast paced world, making advancements day-by-day in every aspect. Technology is one of them, and most probably the most monumental of all. Discoveries and inventions have facilitated our lives, telephone, cars, railways, internet, television, computer etc. are all result of these advancements. Efficiency and productivity in problem solving has increased formidably. With technology access to everything is on our finger tips. Education, communication, entertainment, travel, medical and health industries, etc. all the disciplines had burgeoned with the advent and progress in technology and scientific advancements.
However, technology also possesses a pessimistic side to it. These discoveries and inventions has increased our dependency over them. For instance, in a steel factory, due to the installation of latest machinery and technology in it, the requirement of manpower has decreased. The use of technology has deprecated the abilities of human brain. For example, use of calculators and spell checkers has affected how humans use their brain. The excessive dependence on technology has made people dull in thinking, demeaning the creative aspect of a human being.
As a coda to my opinions, technology has definitely ameliorated our lives, facilitating us with its bestows. However, factors such as over-dependency if not considered, could further result in novel and more intrinsic problems for us to face.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 80
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...orts and facilities. In my opinion, the authors assertion is relatively extreme stating...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
... steel factory, due to the installation of latest machinery and technology in it, the req...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294642857143 0.240241500013 123% => OK
Verbs: 0.139880952381 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0684523809524 0.0880659088768 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0327380952381 0.0497285424764 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0625 0.0444667217837 141% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.113095238095 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0595238095238 0.0406280797675 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.34397156203 2.79330140395 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0238095238095 0.030933414821 77% => OK
Particles: 0.00297619047619 0.0016655270985 179% => OK
Determiners: 0.0714285714286 0.0997080785238 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00297619047619 0.0249443105267 12% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00297619047619 0.0148568991511 20% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1923.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 289.0 452.878318584 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.65397923875 6.0361032391 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.446366782007 0.366273622748 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.36678200692 0.280924506359 131% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.307958477509 0.200843997647 153% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.249134948097 0.132149295362 189% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.34397156203 2.79330140395 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 219.290929204 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.48968727796 122% => OK
Word variations: 65.3652628457 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.45 23.380412469 62% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4454278533 59.4972553346 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.15 141.124799967 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.45 23.380412469 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 51.128200692 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.98734177215 1.64882698954 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371604097083 0.391690518653 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0672014253439 0.123202303941 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0944205222446 0.077325440228 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.446672301312 0.547984918172 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150769303833 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1157367927 0.161403998019 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664330534802 0.0892212321368 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.286077673407 0.385218514788 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.090308412615 0.0692045440612 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240788068144 0.275328986314 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562223733011 0.0653680567796 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.