The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Society is a amalgamation of groups of people with disparate religions, values, customs, traits, knowledge, etc. For a person to lead such a myriad population one has to be ept as well as apt. The issue author put forwards, impugns what way should be adopted to teach and prepare young people for leadership in various disciplines such as government, industry, or other fields-instilling a sense of cooperation or competition. In my view, both of the ways are legitimate for better learning and to become a successful leader.
To begin with, cooperation and competition both prevails in human character by default. Cooperation gives a person a sense of harmony, which is immensely useful in becoming a successful leader. Leadership, basically is to persuade people to your decisions by harmony, which leads in propagation of the organization as a result of it. For instance, a person is considered a rhetoric politician and successful leader only if one has the capacity to bind people into unison, and ultimately lead to the proliferation of society. Cooperation instills a positive atmosphere and a feeling of consensus, which is utterly consequential in the development of a person to become a super leader.
However, author is quite extreme in his assertion and demeans the value of healthy competition, which is the most cardinal ingredient in becoming a eloquent leader. Competition conceives errs of a person. It helps in protruding the frailties in a person, which if taken in a positive manner can help a person to proliferate. For instance if a person working in a multi-national company, is censured and told of his/her loopholes, might be on the beneficiary side. As it would corroborate him/ her in learning about the errs, which when implied over oneself in a positive sense could ultimately lead to progress. Thus, being competent gives an additional direction in the pathway to become a successful leader. To develop a sense of rationality, competition plays a massive role.
As a coda to my opinions, competition and cooperation if edified simultaneously would lead to palpably better results. Ramifications of both the ways of instructing younger people to become successful leader, contains their own advantages with in themselves.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 69
- In order for any work of art like a film or a novel or a poem or a song to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 70
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any o 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 62
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
Society is a amalgamation of groups of people with d...
^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he most cardinal ingredient in becoming a eloquent leader. Competition conceives ...
^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ruding the frailties in a person, which if taken in a positive manner can help a p...
^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e frailties in a person, which if taken in a positive manner can help a person to proliferate. For i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'in my view', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246305418719 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.142857142857 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0862068965517 0.0880659088768 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0320197044335 0.0497285424764 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0270935960591 0.0444667217837 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135467980296 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0394088669951 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.2865220323 2.79330140395 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0418719211823 0.030933414821 135% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.108374384236 0.0997080785238 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0147783251232 0.0249443105267 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0197044334975 0.0148568991511 133% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2257.0 2732.02544248 83% => OK
No of words: 362.0 452.878318584 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23480662983 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.408839779006 0.366273622748 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.337016574586 0.280924506359 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.254143646409 0.200843997647 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.182320441989 0.132149295362 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2865220323 2.79330140395 118% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 56.7428010978 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1111111111 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.655333001 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.388888889 141.124799967 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.674092028746 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 53.8127685697 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 2.08536585366 1.64882698954 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456908235233 0.391690518653 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102743754352 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0568938216869 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.508876431442 0.547984918172 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129440004689 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170761317172 0.161403998019 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874597121924 0.0892212321368 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433205749739 0.385218514788 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0996576196555 0.0692045440612 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314532019479 0.275328986314 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971961720164 0.0653680567796 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.