Tpo23
In this set of material, the reading expresses that population of the yellow cedar, have been dwindling for more than a century, and then brings three reasons for this occurrence, however the lecture finds all reasons inadequate; hence the information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading proposes this hypothesis that possibly the cedar bark beetles have been affecting on reduction of the cedar trees, in contrast the lecture claims that a healthy cedar tree has a great resistance to these types of beetles because the healthy cedar tree include a chemical substance which it can kill these beetles, therefore this theory is rejected.
Second, the author of reading passage declares that the brown bears claw at the cedars to feed the tree bark. inasmuch there is a kind of sugar in cedar's bark that it is common in brown bears' diet, so this type of trees are favorite of bears; consequently this feeding habits in the bears can have harmful impacts on cedar trees and weaken them; on the contrary the lecture contends that it is not an appropriate reason for total reduction of cedars, because cedars have been reducing in all of regions of North America like its islands and there is not any bear in islands.
Third, the reading believes that climate change can be the salient sake for this reduction. Cedar's root used to start growing in the early spring, but now its root commence to grow in the late of winter, subsequently the frozen roots can kill the cedar trees, conversely this idea is challenged by the speaker. It goes without saying that in high elevation the weather is cold and vice versa in low elevation the weather is hot, however it is interesting that majority of cedar trees have killed in low elevation.
- do you agree or disagree?advertising can tell you a lot about a country. 80
- tpo18 85
- do you agree or disagree? people can solve important problems by themselves or by their families without referring to the government. 76
- tpo42 3
- TPO 3 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
that population of the yellow cedar, have been dwindling
that the population of the yellow cedar has been dwindling
because the healthy cedar tree include a chemical substance which it can kill these beetles
because the healthy cedar trees include a chemical substance which can kill these beetles
for total reduction of cedars,
for the total reduction of cedars,
it is interesting that majority of cedar trees have killed in low elevation.
it is interesting that the majority of cedar trees have killed in low elevation.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2 //you have issues on 'a, an, the'
No. of Words: 308 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 12
No. of Words: 308 250
No. of Characters: 1462 1200
No. of Different Words: 158 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.189 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.747 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.387 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 44 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 24.669 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.433 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.433 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Inasmuch
...aw at the cedars to feed the tree bark. inasmuch there is a kind of sugar in cedars bark...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282282282282 0.261695866417 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.165165165165 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0720720720721 0.0723426182421 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.036036036036 0.0435111971325 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.024024024024 0.0277247811725 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.15015015015 0.128828473217 117% => OK
Participles: 0.045045045045 0.0370669169778 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4476191529 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.012012012012 0.0208969081088 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.141141141141 0.128158765124 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.012012012012 0.0158828679856 76% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00600600600601 0.0114777025283 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1797.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 271.125827815 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83441558442 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340909090909 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269480519481 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.152597402597 0.187439937562 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0876623376623 0.113142543107 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4476191529 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 55.4213389771 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 44.0 21.7502111507 202% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 128.369841967 49.3711431718 260% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 256.714285714 132.220823453 194% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.0 21.7502111507 202% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 0.878197800319 244% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 70.9480519481 50.5018328374 140% => OK
Elegance: 2.12 1.90840788429 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.74781300798 0.549887131256 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.192795260185 0.142949733639 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0624466288214 0.0787303798458 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.76624412706 0.631733273073 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.202476151311 0.139662658121 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.470077648218 0.266732575781 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991597494984 0.103435571967 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.441460577877 0.414875509568 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0410275015852 0.0530846634433 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.563885505713 0.40443939384 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041881679876 0.0528353158467 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.