Tpo31
In this set of material, the reading claims that a fossil skeleton of Sinosauropteryx was found among volcanic ash in China. It had some lines on the skeletal bones that some archaeologists believe Sinosauropteryx had feathers; however the reading brings three reasons to refute this theory. On the other hand the lecture finds all reasons unconvincing. The information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the text.
First of all, the reading contends that the lines may have created after Sinosauropteryx's death. In fact its skin's fibers were revealed after decomposing of corps, in contrast the professor declares that other found animals in this region were lack of such lines. Since the fibers are a common material in animals, consequently the lines on skeletal are not related with burning.
Moreover, the author of reading argues that many dinosaurs had a structure as frills. It was located out of some parts of their bodies; hence the lines may have been remains of frills, on the contrary the lecture expresses that there are different chemical materials between feather and frill. The analysis of fossil was determined a substance as keratin. It was a material which was being discovered just in feathers.
The final point, presented in the reading is that these lines were on Sinosauropteryx's backbone and tail, subsequently they were useless, conversely the speaker is challenged this point of view. Pica birds have colorful long feathers on their tail which they attract mate. The experiments were defined that Sinosauropteryx's feather was colorful and this dinosaur could have used this feather for display function like Pica.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | noushinhaddad | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | atefehndi | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | ali.hasani1992 | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | Hamide | 70 | view |
- which one is better in your opinion? it is better to the governments spend as much money as possible exploring outer space like traveling to the moon or other planets, or they should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. 83
- do you agree or disagree? technology has made world complicated. 76
- do you agree or disagree?it is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are young than old. 76
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.do you agree or disagree? 80
- do you agree or disagree with this sentence?to remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success. 30
Comments
Essay evaluation report
conversely the speaker is challenged this point of view.
conversely the speaker is challenged by this point of view.
conversely the speaker is challenging this point of view.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 265 250
No. of Characters: 1373 1200
No. of Different Words: 144 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.035 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.181 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.893 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.833 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.323 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.323 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.293103448276 0.261695866417 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.186206896552 0.158904122519 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.051724137931 0.0723426182421 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0275862068966 0.0435111971325 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0275862068966 0.0277247811725 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155172413793 0.128828473217 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0620689655172 0.0370669169778 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8885159487 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00344827586207 0.0208969081088 17% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134482758621 0.128158765124 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0103448275862 0.0158828679856 65% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00689655172414 0.0114777025283 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1663.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 265.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27547169811 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377358490566 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31320754717 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207547169811 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11320754717 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8885159487 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.098376869 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9285714286 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1071818182 49.3711431718 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 132.220823453 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 50.2493261456 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.11428571429 1.90840788429 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.741576005328 0.549887131256 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119977289522 0.142949733639 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0435583663991 0.0787303798458 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572920481637 0.631733273073 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12020519546 0.139662658121 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.321086486093 0.266732575781 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130325944818 0.103435571967 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.35131475258 0.414875509568 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0788652348115 0.0530846634433 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.535400564223 0.40443939384 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920382807817 0.0528353158467 174% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.