According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
The argument states numerous assumption and lacks clear evidences as to why a movie produced by Super Screen experienced lesser footfalls. Although, there is a high possibility that lack of advertising campaigns could be one of the reason. The sheer lack of evidences requires answers to the question as it could redeem the argument to fall apart.
Reviews are based on user's personal choice, movie genre and should not be confused with the quality of cinema produced. Having many positive review simple means that the majority of people liked the movie as a whole, but their might be some part which they weren't able to comprehend or some part which was too peternatural to understand. A movie based on stephen hawkins, might be loved and reviewd positiviely by the community of science students but those under humanities might simply not even go to the movie. Thus, probably a lot more positive review. It is only after we know the genre of the movie and the type of audiences we could get specific answer to the apparent paradox of the argument.
Furthur, the report is based on market analysis and it has been said that last year experienced a fewer foot-falls. We don't know decrease in percentage of ticket buyers. There could be a reson that a year prior to the decrease was supposed to be the last film of the sequence. Additionally, people didn't liked the idea of watching the next part which was actually the prequel. X-men was initially to have just three parts. however the production house launched another movie and people were just not intereseted anymore in those movies. If we are to judge for the reasons of lesser ticket sold, we need to know what were the previous movies released by the production house and how those stories relate to the movie released last year.
Percentage of positive reviews increased but we have no idea as wether that was because of the reasons that advertising director advocate or some arbitary reason. Movie might be released on netflix in such a case it would be a wise decision to put money on advertisement. Otherwise, it could be the case with what happened with Dark knight rises and The godfather the mere review fight by the supporters of the specific clans degraded their review on their counterparts faviourate movie Which made shawshank redemption to attain the first position.
To sum it up, although it might seem a wise choice to put in a larger share of budget for advertisement purposes. However, it is only after we can know the genre of the movie released last year, precentages of positive reviews, and the way market reports were collected, we could then be able to make a wise decisions. Advertising director must answer to the above questions, which would help in evaluating in the profibility of allocating higher budget for marketing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | Venkateshwar | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Venkateshwar | 23 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Smrithi B R | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | sampath srini | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | harshalg007 | 42 | view |
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated. 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them. 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er Screen experienced lesser footfalls. Although, there is a high possibility that lack ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...but their might be some part which they werent able to comprehend or some part which w...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...year experienced a fewer foot-falls. We dont know decrease in percentage of ticket b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...m of the sequence. Additionally, people didnt liked the idea of watching the next par...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...was initially to have just three parts. however the production house launched another m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...was initially to have just three parts. however the production house launched another m...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26499032882 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.164410058027 0.15541462614 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0657640232108 0.0836205057962 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0464216634429 0.0520304965353 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0386847195358 0.0272364105082 142% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.112185686654 0.125424944231 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0386847195358 0.0416121511921 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64405257947 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.036750483559 0.026700313972 138% => OK
Particles: 0.00193423597679 0.001811407834 107% => OK
Determiners: 0.116054158607 0.113004496875 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0309477756286 0.0255425247493 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0174081237911 0.0127820249294 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2814.0 2731.13054187 103% => OK
No of words: 481.0 446.07635468 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85031185031 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.57801047555 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320166320166 0.378187486979 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241164241164 0.287650121315 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193347193347 0.208842608468 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10395010395 0.135150697306 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64405257947 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 207.018472906 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494802494802 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 57.2415150489 52.1807786196 110% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.039408867 105% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9047619048 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8084660421 57.7814097925 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 141.986410481 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9047619048 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.724660767414 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 47.0211860212 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.66666666667 1.8405768891 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346763788044 0.441005458295 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0839518426017 0.135418324435 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0678878866083 0.0829849096947 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517989203953 0.58762219726 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17180087786 0.147661913831 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131469077979 0.193483328276 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589053758804 0.0970749176394 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.458565551632 0.42659136922 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0457905330714 0.0774707102158 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233772584747 0.312017818177 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356502524736 0.0698173142475 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 6.46551724138 155% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 14.657635468 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.