"Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes remain lower than those in neighboring towns. Moreover, Clearview's mayor promises many new programs to improve schools, streets, and public services. And best of all, retirees in Clearview can also expect excellent health care as they grow older, since the number of physicians in the area is far greater than the national average."
The author in the above argument concludes that Clearview is best way to live for the retire. The author has suggested with many of illogical evidence which are baseless. I am in completely disagreement with that of the author. There seems many loop hole in it. The author has concluded with many of assumptions. I would try to enable it in above paragraph.
First of all, the author says the conclusion without any strong evidence that Clearview should be on the top choice for anyone who retire. As the necessities of the living vary from person to person. So it is very difficult to conclude that this will fill all necessities of the all retire people. Thus this seems one the main assumption taken by the author without any proper evidence. Furthermore, the author says that cost of the housing has decreased in the past year, so it will decrease will the next year also. This a merely unjustified assumption taken, as we can never predict the future. Time change and so the situations changes, so to be dependent on the previous record is not sounding properly.
Secondly, the author relates its evidence with that of the mayor. He says that mayor has promise so improve school, street and public street. There insensible comparison between the advancement of the school and better place for retire has been shown. The advancement in the school, street and public street seems no rays with that of the conclusion of the author.
Thirdly, the author has support his argument with the baseless statistical view. The author says that number of the physician in the Clearview is more than that of the national average. The retire people needs may be more than physician also. On the specific basis of the physician, we cannot conclude our decision.
On conclusion, to wrap my evidence over this issue over this issue, I would like to bulk all evidence as a whole. There are many illogical assumptions which hamper’s human reading ability to conclude for it. Moreover, there does not seems any ray for the acceptance with author view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | dvtien95 | 74 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Zhang Ergou | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | saloni.p | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | Jethro Jiang | 35 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | omarsamiiir | 63 | view |
- Nations should suspend govt. funding forthe arts when significant numbers of theircitizens are hungry and unemployed. 16
- Scientist and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 50
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...above argument concludes that Clearview is best way to live for the retire. The author ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... that Clearview is best way to live for the retire. The author has suggested with many of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the top choice for anyone who retire. As the necessities of the living vary from...
^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...l necessities of the all retire people. Thus this seems one the main assumption take...
^^^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... so it will decrease will the next year also. This a merely unjustified assumption t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... to be dependent on the previous record is not sounding properly. Secondly, the author relates...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...more than that of the national average. The retire people needs may be more than physician...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...people needs may be more than physician also. On the specific basis of the physician...
^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
...nclude for it. Moreover, there does not seems any ray for the acceptance with author ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...nclude for it. Moreover, there does not seems any ray for the acceptance with author ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224489795918 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.135204081633 0.15541462614 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0867346938776 0.0836205057962 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0459183673469 0.0520304965353 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0382653061224 0.0272364105082 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.150510204082 0.125424944231 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0255102040816 0.0416121511921 61% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58106290398 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0204081632653 0.026700313972 76% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.145408163265 0.113004496875 129% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0229591836735 0.0255425247493 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00765306122449 0.0127820249294 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2045.0 2731.13054187 75% => OK
No of words: 350.0 446.07635468 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84285714286 6.12365571057 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345714285714 0.378187486979 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.234285714286 0.287650121315 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174285714286 0.208842608468 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12 0.135150697306 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58106290398 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 207.018472906 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494285714286 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 51.5725890578 52.1807786196 99% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.039408867 120% => OK
Sentence length: 14.5833333333 23.2022227129 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6434469221 57.7814097925 46% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2083333333 141.986410481 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 23.2022227129 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.724660767414 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 3.58251231527 279% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 38.0119047619 51.9672348444 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.82558139535 1.8405768891 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253806147952 0.441005458295 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103695824103 0.135418324435 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0744325150447 0.0829849096947 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.549494218217 0.58762219726 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126891083157 0.147661913831 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982806726903 0.193483328276 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596901755106 0.0970749176394 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.37762021572 0.42659136922 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.163541123447 0.0774707102158 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164766474786 0.312017818177 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501421458383 0.0698173142475 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.82512315271 249% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.82389162562 283% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More arguments wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.