The reading provides three ways to address the decline of Torreya, which is a type of trees that soon will become extinct. On the other hand, the professor refutes each author's Torreya's survival ways and argues with them logically.
First, the reading explains the first way. In this way we could reestablish Torreya in the same location that it used to live for thousands of years. Torrya's sites are in northern part of Florida, which has a distinctive micro climate, wetter and cooler differs from its surrounding relatively dried regions. On the contrary, the professor mentions that this way is not efficient. She states that micro climate areas are easily affected by large scale changing around them. That is because surrounding micro climate regions causes global warming and draining wetlands. So, Torreya has no chance to survive there.
Second, the readings states that humans could interfere and migrate Torreya to suitable environment. In contrast, the professor aware us by saying that if humans interrupt, other species which are in extinction dangers right now would vanish right away. All because, Torreya would spread so quickly.
Last but not least, the reading claims that scientists could preserve Torreya in laboratory and researching centers in order to monitor them and protect them. In addition, this observation may be used to continued survival of species. Nevertheless, the professor accounts this way by saying that there are no laboratories as huge as Torreya's appropriate environment. Also, those research centers must have abundant capacity and genetically diverse.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 80
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 70
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 10
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 80
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 12
No. of Words: 251 250
No. of Characters: 1316 1200
No. of Different Words: 155 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.98 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.243 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.575 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.688 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.039 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.505 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.101 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269503546099 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.145390070922 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0744680851064 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.063829787234 0.0435111971325 147% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031914893617 0.0277247811725 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117021276596 0.128828473217 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0283687943262 0.0370669169778 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6473676397 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0212765957447 0.0208969081088 102% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0886524822695 0.128158765124 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0283687943262 0.0158828679856 179% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0141843971631 0.0114777025283 124% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1606.0 1645.83664459 98% => OK
No of words: 251.0 271.125827815 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3984063745 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.430278884462 0.374372842146 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.342629482072 0.287516216867 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231075697211 0.187439937562 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119521912351 0.113142543107 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6473676397 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637450199203 0.539623497131 118% => OK
Word variations: 70.5304453548 53.8517498576 131% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.6875 21.7502111507 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4046704971 49.3711431718 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 132.220823453 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 21.7502111507 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 49.9504482072 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.72058823529 1.90840788429 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.623243004658 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0643488003934 0.142949733639 45% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0429491353356 0.0787303798458 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.452447381284 0.631733273073 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142646820558 0.139662658121 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209919476723 0.266732575781 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120384352245 0.103435571967 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.256886863227 0.414875509568 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0157729748749 0.0530846634433 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.412165856672 0.40443939384 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057353794724 0.0528353158467 109% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.