Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The author of the article argues that critics believe that fine lines of the skeletal bones of the fossil of a dinosaur which was discovered in volcanic ashes, was not strong evidence of existence of feather in this animal and cites three reasons. In contrast, the professor repudiates the critic's opinion and proves that this dinosaur had feathers.
Firstly, according to the reading the lines of the fossil of dinosaur decomposed into fibers, since it is buried in volcanic ash and has been maintained as line of the fossil. As a result, these fine lines are not evidences of feather. On the other hand, the lecturer implies that other animals which were buried in the same site were well-preserved and their structure was not changed. Therefore, she explains that decomposition did not occur in the skin of this dinosaur.
In addition, the author of the passage emphasizes that as dinosaur mostly had frills in their body, the fine lines are remains of frills rather than feathers. On the contrary, the speaker indicates that a certain kind of protein has been found in the fossil. In other words, she mentions that lines are remains of feathers, since this certain protein is found in feathers rather than frills.
Finally, the reading makes it clear that the main functions of the feather are in fly and adjusting their body temperature and dinosaurs did not fly and hardly use the feather to thermal regulation. Therefore, there is no present for feather, since the dinosaur did not need these functions. However, the professor discusses that feathers in some animals have different application rather than fly or thermal regulation. For example, some of birds are using their colorful feather for mating. Hence, it is likely that the dinosaur use their feather for different purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dentista1985 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jiyakavya | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jiyakavya | 3 | view |
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 86
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'critics'' or 'critic's'?
Suggestion: critics'; critic's
... contrast, the professor repudiates the critics opinion and proves that this dinosaur h...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the birds') or simply say ''some birds''.
Suggestion: some of the birds; some birds
...fly or thermal regulation. For example, some of birds are using their colorful feather for ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'as a result', 'in other words', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254545454545 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.172727272727 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0454545454545 0.0435111971325 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.030303030303 0.0277247811725 109% => OK
Prepositions: 0.172727272727 0.128828473217 134% => OK
Participles: 0.0454545454545 0.0370669169778 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56263591507 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00606060606061 0.0208969081088 29% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118181818182 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00606060606061 0.0114777025283 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1799.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03691275168 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375838926174 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305369127517 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197986577181 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11744966443 0.113142543107 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56263591507 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469798657718 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.753015297 53.8517498576 85% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2857142857 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7569378175 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.21428571429 0.878197800319 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 51.8226270374 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.90243902439 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289642247395 0.549887131256 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13658797227 0.142949733639 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0738254691201 0.0787303798458 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594073671532 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162113320886 0.139662658121 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144105981848 0.266732575781 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869565891541 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.469384467457 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104250695926 0.0530846634433 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228463127578 0.40443939384 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303466885898 0.0528353158467 57% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.