The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
It is a controversial subject for people to decide whether the well-being of all its citizens in a country is the best metric to gauge the effectiveness of its leaders or not. Some people may agree this statement, for the reason that the welfare of humankind is the shared vision of both national leaders and ordinary people. But I, though regard it as a main factor, will appraise the effectiveness of national leaders from multiple dimensions in different times:the long-run improvement of well-being of all its people, creative solution to difficulties and dangers they face, the striking effects on human existence they make. In addition, we should owe our well-being to leaders, artists, scientists and ourselves.
Admittedly, the well-being of all the citizens is an important indicator to measure the effectiveness of national leaders, because people is one of the basic elements of a distinct national entity in political geography. Firstly, no one can deny their satisfaction with high quality of standard of life, compared to poor health, little happiness, low income. For this reason, as top authorities, what needs for their work is to meet their obligations to all the citizens. Secondly, the public is the cornerstone of social existence, who contributes their efforts to the stability and booming of a society. Only with the support from all areas of people can national leaders efficiently get things moving, and vice versa----they would have to be confronted with strikes, chaos, turmoil, or even worsely, insurrection. Thirdly, it is also necessary for a nation to remain sustainable progress and development. Just as the Chinese saying goes, the same knife cuts bread and fingers. So, the national leaders should not forget to go around with the burden of human well-being on their shoulders the whole time, as do Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Sweden, Norway, the top ranks of the World Happiness Index in 2016.
However, don't forget the fact that the public welfare can hardly do without the achievements of the artists and scientists in a nation, and even the diffusion of knowledge and technology abroad, as many people argue that those from different fields devote themselves to the prosperity of their country. For instance, artists like Beethoven(musician), Van Gosh(painter), Ieoh Ming Pei(architect), Yang Liping(dancer), make our life colorful, comfortable, and sometimes give us a kind of feeling that we seem to go to a world of beauty beyond description; scientists like Yuan Longping(agronomist), Qian Xuesen(aerodynamicist), Chu Kochen(geographer and meteorologist), modified human existence towards being more convenient, sustainable, happy, all of them have greatly enhanced the Happiness Index of humankind. Most importantly, general people like civil servants, soldiers, firemen, construction workers, also contribute their hard work to the public welfare. In a word, nearly everybody does work of this kind and that to other's happiness.
Moreover, predominated by supreme leaders, a revolutionary change in a country is a matter of reflecting the effectiveness of their work. Take two great figures as examples, one is Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's republic of China, unified a divided country and created socialism, resulting in a vast improvement in life for the Chinese people: the longer life expectancy, the lower infant baby mortality, the swelling literacy, the profound reduction in violence. Another example is Deng Xiaoping, the maker of modern China, who put the country on a path of rapid economic development and to bring it into the mainstream of international life by reforming and opening-up, leading to a big move in economic growth and the standard of life of hundreds of millions of people. So great are their accomplishments that they have altered the situation not only of China but of the world. Besides President Lincoln led the United States through its Civil War, abolished slavery, modernized the economy, and Chairman Xi Jinping is launching the movement of anti-corruption, all of which reveal the achievements of these leaders.
Last but not least, faced with the complicated and fast-changing world, the effectiveness of today's national leaders manifests from various aspects. Except for the well-being of its citizens, more indicators can reveal these leaders' performance: strategic and comprehensive vision, fast-response to diverse crises, creative thinking to knotty problems, inspiring teamwork to produce synergistic effect, fashioning national spirit of equality, fairness, bravery, cohesion, peace, innovation, devotion, friendship, and so on, and what matters is the use of different metrics with the necessity of era to measure their efficient work.
Therefore, from the above analysis, the effectiveness of national leaders exhibits various facets according to different contexts they live. To be fair and reasonable, the appraisement for the work of national leaders should include multidimensional metrics, not merely the well-being of all its citizens.
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 75
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada’s arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, 58
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 83
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d Happiness Index in 2016. However, dont forget the fact that the public welfare...
^^^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...izens, more indicators can reveal these leaders performance: strategic and comprehensiv...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, as to, except for, for instance, in addition, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => OK
Preposition: 116.0 58.6224719101 198% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4274.0 2235.4752809 191% => OK
No of words: 776.0 442.535393258 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50773195876 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.27795192801 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23273967448 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 415.0 215.323595506 193% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534793814433 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 1304.1 704.065955056 185% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 112.708232175 60.3974514979 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.96 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.04 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.24 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19649564392 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559160593359 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062070472029 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116865309423 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659355081077 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.8420337079 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.27 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 250.0 100.480337079 249% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.