Should scrutiny of the well-being of country’s citizens be the best measurable tool for whether the leader is effective or not? I disagree with the author’s assertion since so called “well-being” can have different meanings for each people. Besides, since some policy focusing on specific well-being such as universal education would make some people lose their existing opportunities to some extent, which decreases the leader’s effectiveness. Thus, the well-being is not the best tool for measuring the effectiveness of the leader.
Of course, improving the well-being of the country’s citizen is one of the main role of a country’s leader. The public might have elected the leader in the hope that he or she would improve their well-being much. If the leader rarely considered the well-being of the public, he or she would be regarded as denying the promises that the leader might vow to do before election. Then, people will want to change their leader let alone regarding him or her as not being an effective leader. Nonetheless, it is not the best tools for measuring the effectiveness of the leader.
First, the term “well-being” is too subjective depending the people’s thought. For instance, while some might think that well-being infers higher education attainment, water sanitation, security and so forth, but the other would consider it as intangible one such as happiness, social relationship and a sense of security. If the leader more focused on making the policy relevant to universal education than making the social programs that people can meet each other, those who think education is the very well-being would think that the leader is effective. On the contrary, for people who regard the social program is an indicator of well-being, the leader would not be effective. Likewise, since the definition of the well-being is different depending on the people, the effectiveness of the leader cannot be measured appropriately by investigating the well-being of the citizens.
Furthermore, suppose that whole society agrees the well-being infers universal education system: All citizens can benefit from at least elementary education without cost, and as a result the leader introduced free elementary education while abolishing higher education scholarship program. Anyway, we can measure the welfare by calculating the number of people who finish the free elementary schools. Unfortunately, those who wanted to receive higher education would lose their opportunities to learn more due to free elementary education policy. While all people could finish elementary education without individual costs, but some people would have gave up their dream. In that case, can we say that the leader was effective policy-maker? No one knows. Other than the case of universal education system, other things such as security and social programs would generate both the people who receive the benefits and the others who loses their existing chances. Even though measuring the well-being became available, nobody cannot firmly say that the leader is effective since somebody’s welfare increase could be the losses of the others.
To sum up, since the well-being have too subjective definitions depending on the people’s experiences, it is very hard to measure the well-being and it would lead to deterioration of some people’s welfare. Thus, I disagree with the author’s argument that examining the well-being is the best to evaluate the effectiveness of the leader.
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 50
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 69
Do you think the two
Do you think the two supporting reasons of my argument are convincing?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Should scrutiny of the well-being of cou...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng the effectiveness of the leader. Of course, improving the well-being of t...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng the effectiveness of the leader. First, the term 'well-being' i...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the well-being of the citizens. Furthermore, suppose that whole society ...
^^
Line 7, column 654, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
...idual costs, but some people would have gave up their dream. In that case, can we sa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 654, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...idual costs, but some people would have gave up their dream. In that case, can we sa...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could be the losses of the others. To sum up, since the well-being have too...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, likewise, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, thus, well, while, at least, for instance, of course, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3007.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51743119266 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22438315758 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425688073394 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 935.1 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9183774602 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.291666667 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7083333333 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297756402667 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120314485557 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973588655764 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224759660398 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912757987935 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.