the table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
Given is the table revealing the popularity of cycling to work among citizens of the various regions in the UK during the period from 2001 to 2011.
It is evident that the biggest change was seen in inner London and not a single area in the Uk experienced a decease in the number of inhabitants using bikes to work.
To specify, from over 43000 of population traveling by bike, Inner London saw a soar to a staggering of over 100 000 people using bikes, which had the highest change of 144%. The second in terms of using bikes was outer London with over 49000 residents in 2011, however, its percentage of change was the lowest at 45%.
Brighton and hove, meanwhile saw the second biggest increase in the number of residents cycling to work with 109%, but Briston was the UK’ second city in terms of total numbers if cycling commuters with just under 16000 in 2011. Strikingly, figures for other eight areas were below 10 thousand in both years.
- today, more school leavers are unable to find jobs. discuss the causes of rising unemployment among young adults and suggest any solutions. 78
- in the modern world more and more emphasis is being replaced on the acquisition of practical skills rather than knowledge from books and other resources discuss both advantages and disadvantages of this trend 50
- Topic: some people think that the best way to gather information is through newspapers while others believe in other better ways. Discuss both of views. 78
- migration has become more common in society. is it a positive or negative development. to what extend do you agree or disagree with migration. 78
- in order to improve the quality of education high school students should be encouraged to evaluate and criticise their teachers but others think that it will result in loss of respect and discipline in classroom what is your opinion 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65882352941 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3282231073 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6909910887 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28971910868 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137665595749 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838767729614 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183869184218 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720623535497 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.