Some people think that only the best students should be rewarded. Others, however, it is more important to reward student who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Student rewards are the most common way to honour outstanding students; therefore, some people claim that only top students should be awarded. However, some people approve that it is better to award students who have their academic results improved. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints and state my opinion.
To begin with, there are various points which support awarding students who have gained their results. Firstly, many students show continuous efforts to go beyond their limitations in studying; it is possible that some students have obstacles during their studying semesters, such as financial status or health problems; therefore, they are deserved a prize for their significant efforts. Secondly, it motivates students who do not have an excellent learning capacity trying harder to achieve higher grades.
However, there are many reasons why only top students should be awarded. School’s examinations are the basic method but effective to evaluate students’ efforts and ability; it is evident that only students who try them best will achieve high grades in the exams; therefore, top students are the most appropriate to be rewarded. Besides that, it not only encourages other students to study harder to get the prize but also creates a competitive learning environment, which is now the global tendency thanks to its positive effects on students’ results.
In conclusion, both forms of awarding have its own advantages. Thus, from my perspective, I support to reward both groups of students as a prize for their efforts. However, it should be a discrimination between two forms to promote its values appropriately.
- To improve their appearances, many people spend money a lot of money on products like clothing, haircut, and beauty products. Some people think it is a good way to spend money; other people believe that there are better ways to spend money. Discuss both v 79
- We should encourage young people to visit different countries as it could bring many benefits to them Do you agree or disagree 86
- In some countries more and more adults choose to continue to live with their parents after they graduate and have found jobs Do the advantages of this trend is outweigh its disadvantages 79
- Some people think that only the best students should be rewarded Others however it is more important to reward student who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people believe that young peop who comit seriuos crimes should be punished in the same way as adutls. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44573643411 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8973924691 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6876365643 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364077414678 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140768839681 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655199822626 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229976203071 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849915187523 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.