There are myriad considerations or factors that every one must take into account regarding success in a future career. I strongly believe that to achieve success, the ability of the individual to relate well to people is more essential than studying hard in school. One can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side, the reasons will be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, having the power to relate well to people bring strong business relationships with quality positions in a company, this is vital in any job. The worker who have magnificent communication skills posses a high probability to get promoted in the company. Relationships with high position managers exposes the person to be noticed and under the spotlight. If an employer who lacks the skills to communicate and has an assignment to make a presentation about a certain work issue, would he be capable of explaining his views and ideas? If that is a devastating problem, then what did study hard in school and getting a grade mark benefit him in real harsh life.
Furthermore, relating well to people have various psychological effects on one's personality, which is the true mirror to society. Important and effective communication skills sparkles the individual and peak the level of personal satisfaction to the most. A satisfied employee is definitely a better person with high capabilities. For example, an engineer who has the charisma inside a company would be happier at a personal level, and more creative in his assignments from a business point of view, this breaks the ice when communicating with different group members or between the company and their competition, amused employees are strongly equal to a powerful company.
Last but not least, from a financial perspective, the ability to relate well to people is financially more rewarding, since every one demands a higher check. When related to wealthy people with a high pay, the worker would absolutely be more motivated to do a perfect task and reach his aim, the goal of success. Money encourages the person to dream huge, resulting in a person who follows the right track to achieve the peak, concluding that hard and smart work is completely related to communication skills.
Due to aforementioned ground, the ability to relate well to people is the most myriad characteristic for a successful individual who aim high in his life. It's rewards are related to many aspects in life including business, psychological, and financial issues.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 60
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 90
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, well, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10705596107 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97367003176 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557177615572 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1788307429 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.470588235 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1764705882 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249804679356 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079916180859 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702535323098 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146702059654 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048952764274 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.