If you could invent something new, what product would you develop?
Upon the above question, different people have different opinions based on their feeling, education, culture, etc. Some people prefer to invent extraordinary cars that move from one continent to another in a few hours or make new robots to take care of babies. Frankly, if I could invent something new, I would definitely develop an advanced device to remove all the pollution from air, water and soil. In the following paragraphs, I will try to explain my position more clearly.
First and foremost, air pollution is a major issue in big cities. Many people suffer from air pollution in winters and they have to move to countryside or towns to get rid of this problem. In my country, government has to close schools and factories in winters and it is has negative consequences both on education and economy of the country. In my opinion, a device that can eliminate pollutants is the most necessary thing for my country.
In the second place, in most regions of the world, drinking water is contaminated by heavy metals like copper, cadmium and so forth. These metals are toxic to humans and people who drink this water are more prone to cancer and mental disorders. According to the latest researchers which were published in well-known journals, water pollution is the most significant challenge in developing countries and people have difficulties getting access to high quality water.
Last but not least, soil pollution is another important problem not only in my country, but also in all over the world. A lot of factories release their wastes into the environment and pollute both the water and soil. Countless farmlands are surrounded by factories and since farmers grow plants in these regions, pollutants find their ways into our crops.
Taking all the aforementioned arguments into account, it can be concluded that inventing a product that can eliminate or reduce heavy metals and other pollutants from air, water and soil is a great idea based on the reasons which I outlined above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | theprasad | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | ngaliulin | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | joyce05 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | Alina_irfan | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | Alina_irfan | 60 | view |
- Learning from the past has no value for those of us living in the present Do you agree or disagree 93
- Groups and organizations are an important part of some people’s lives. Why are groups and organizations important to people? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example a play, concert or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching th 60
- Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer spaces. Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money on our basic needs on earth. Which of these two opinions do you agree with? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made the world a better place to live. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... most necessary thing for my country. In the second place, in most regions of th...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the reasons which I outlined above.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, frankly, if, second, so, well, as to, in my opinion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99700598802 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70430889516 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8911742466 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.266666667 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834957349757 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02784583861 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660309382959 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483037422472 0.150856017488 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063351812669 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.