The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. Do you agree or disagree?
The author of the issue highlights that greatness of people can be perceived just by those who live after them. Due to the controversial nature of this question there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that when people are in close contact with each other, they can better identify individuals' greatness. In the following paragraphs some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, people should have many positive hallmarks when it comes to greatness and not until they make a close relation with their contemporaries can their characters recognized. Broadly speaking, many people are on the believe that we should learn many things from our past generation but others on the other hand allege that people should make an effort to imitate positive behavior of individuals' greatness when they are alive. Indeed, when these people are alive they have crowds of things to teach and in this way people could identify their greatness by being in close relation. For instance, as recent studies shown greatness of individuals have forgotten after a period of time when they decided just by people who live after them. In fact, greatness could be transmit vigorously when people are alive and people are in close relationship. To elucidate more on this issue, not only can greatness of people appreciate dramatically by current people but also can breathe new life into each other and make a progress day in day out.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that people make more values for each other when they are alive. As far as I am concerned, being away from each other could have deleterious effects not only on relations but also on greatness of individuals. Generally phrased, experiences have shown us that when people die, other forget them even forever and do not appreciate and perceive their greatness. For example, whole people know Cyrus, king of Persia, which after his death all of his greatness die out but people in his current era knew his values and were thankful for them. Delve further into the issue, hardly ever can people realize and understand greatness of individuals in past generation owing to the fact that they are not familiar with the ways they lived and forget after a period of time.
However, what I alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, it is established beyond doubt that greatness of people are transmitting generation by generation and vast majorities of people are thankful for their efforts. As a matter of fact, when we are alive, we do not know the values of each other and are not able to learn each other. But many people bend over backwards to make a value for individuals greatness after their death and in some case, spread out their ways of living and characteristics. However, it does not make those preceding benefits pale.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-26 | amirbahman | 66 | view |
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions be 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that the whole society today expect young people to follow are too strict. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. 8
- Some people believe that the best way of learning about life is by listening to the advice of family and friends. Other people believe that the best way of learning about life is through personal experience. Which do you prefer? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d. Broadly speaking, many people are on the believe that we should learn many things from o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...roadly speaking, many people are on the believe that we should learn many things from o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s of individuals have forgotten after a period of time when they decided just by people who li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 795, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the ways they lived and forget after a period of time. However, what I alluded to above c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e. However, what I alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, broadly speaking, for example, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2520.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96062992126 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68165152145 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442913385827 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3990666347 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1904761905 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247843141459 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893420100031 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084202467156 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148356754962 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791318185155 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.