TPO43
The reading passage claims that agnostids became extinct too many years ago and from fossil records of rocky materials scientists have found that they were primitive arthropods. Also, the information given by fossil is not enough to determine their behavior and living condition but there are several theories that describe their situations. However, the lecturer finds all the theories dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author contends that it is ideal to assume that they were free swimming marine mammals that hunted other species. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that agnostids swim in Open Ocean and they had very large eyes but tiny and pure well-developed eyes or somehow blind prevented them from hunting other organisms. Indeed, there is no fossil record to represent their well-developed eyes.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that agnostids would have survived by feeding on dead organisms and may have inhibited on the seafloor. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that they did not have the ability to move fast at very large distances. In fact, they move slowly in localized geographic areas where they originated.
Finally, as set forth by the author agnostids might have been parasites owing to the fact that they may be fed on primitive fish or other species. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that parasites population is not very large and if there were majorities of parasites, they would have killed other organisms or species. So, we could not take this theory into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
...smisses this issue due to the fact that parasites population is not very large and if the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18846153846 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61819701728 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5385077829 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.416666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402354099997 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133072680533 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975188123378 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231260015305 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361950994362 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.