Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Athletes and entertainers can be good politicians.
I tend to agree that the involvement of sportsmen and entertainers in the field of politics is more likely to be acceptable and successful, benefiting the society at large. This is because athletes and entertainers are well equipped with benevolent intentions and desirable qualities.
Initially, they could become good politicians as long as they are determined to change the society and make social contributions. For example, Deng Yaping, a distinguished athlete in China, won themselves a place in politics after the retirement of playing table tennis.
Additionally, celebrities’ social interactions and social networks are always stronger than ordinary people all levels of society.
Finally, their intelligence and devotion on society will lead to the achievement on politics
In conclusion, I am convinced that participation of athletes and entertainers in the field of politics will lead to numerous benefits on account of the virtues of intelligence, devotion, and determination to change society in their possession
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-31 | ouyang_919 | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ordinary people all levels of society. Finally, their intelligence and devotion...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 1977.66487455 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 154.0 407.700716846 38% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75324675325 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 4.48103885553 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4732430238 2.67179642975 130% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 212.727598566 45% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 618.680645161 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.6003584229 29% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.207501818 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.666666667 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130844246538 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636594961353 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505704056663 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609540306704 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684286066153 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 58.1214874552 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.