Some people think that the government should spend as much money as possible on protecting tha environment. Other think money should be spent on other things such as education and healthcare. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Our planet is astonoshing and highly deverce, and this is the people`s duty to keep it safe for next generations. I personally think that government should fund protection of the envirinments as much as possible. The reasons why I hold this stance will be elaborated in the paragraphs below.
One of the reasons is that living in the clean envoronment facilitates humans` health. It is the statistically proved fact that people live longer life in places, which lack or has insignificant amount of factories around. Industrial facilities emence tremendous amount of pollutants in the atmosphere annually, leading to enhancing of acid rains, which in turn demolish forests and this way, increase concentration of the carbone dioxide and decrease fraction of the pure oxygen in the air. This contributes to evolving of a myriad of desease throughout the society. If government sponsors programs to confine releasing the pollutants by the factories, people will struggle from illnesses in the lower degree than they do nowadays. Although spending money on the healthcere is indispensible, it will be less demanded in case of amaliorating humans wellbeing in the natural way. To that end, protecting of the planet is likely to enable raise humans` quality of life.
Another reason is that the planet in habitat not just for humans, but for other species as well. Some of the humans` activities result in destroying natural environment for scores of animals. All of them are part of the ecosystem, and if people threaten one specie if can lead to deterioration of others. For istance, as was sayd in the one magasine recently, deforestation of the forest in one of the states in the U.S. made possible the near extinction of particular specie of the chipmonkey, and then lead to decrease of the other, which was dependent from the first one. If gevernment craft more national parks, the desister like this will be avoided. So, spending money on the perotecting of the animals will sav ethem for next generations.
To recapitulate, I feel that it is pivotal to sponsor environmental projects by the govebnment. This is because it will improve life conditions for the humans and other creatures living on the Earth.
- What are the good qualities or features of a good newspaper, current affairs television program, or news website? Use specific details and examples to explain your answer. 76
- What is a very important skill a person should learn in order to be successful in the world today Choose one skill and use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 73
- Groups or organizations are an important part of some people’s lives. Why are groups or organizations important to people? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 80
- Many people have a close relationships with their pets. These people trat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... humans, but for other species as well. Some of the humans' activities result in destr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd other creatures living on the Earth.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, well, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13736263736 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06125820132 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563186813187 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3550254094 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.45110844103 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181239936977 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519070357481 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501451887402 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103322241316 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312850919911 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.