The reading and the lecture are both about the use of hydrogen fuel-cell as the source of energy for car, which pose a deabate about the pros and cons of such promising replacement. The author of the reading is being obtimistic about the prospect of hydrogen fuel-cell, while the lecturer casts doubts on all the claims that the author made in the article. She on the other hand, thinks that hydrogenn fuel-cell contain internal problem needed to be solve before it become widely accepted.
First of all, the author says that hydrogen fuel-cell is the replacement for conventional resource used as the source of energy for cars. He argues that others resources like gasoline and diesel are finite resources and could be depleted any time soon. The lecturer cast doubt on this notion. Eventhough she agree that conventional sources of energy are finite, but the progress of producing hydrogen is also require the use of energy from those resources. Furthermore, she mentions the difficulty in store hydrogen in its liquid form also require lots of energy.
Secondly, the author favor hydrogen fuel-cell for its eco-friendly propertie and believes it could help to reduce pollution. The professor is not in line with his opinion. She puts forth the ideas that the process of making hydrogen is also generate pollution. She points her attention to the hydrogen factory and agrues about its role in generate pollution.
Finally, the author mentions the low cost of using hydrogen due to its high efficency to create engergy. The professor is not agree with the author. She believes that due to the requirement of platinum, which is a very expensive material, in the engine the cost of operate hydrogen fuel-cell based vehicle is still very expensive.
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 56
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- INTEGRATED TASK: Summarize the points in the lecture stating how they cast doubts on the reading passage topic points. 3
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...st doubt on this notion. Eventhough she agree that conventional sources of energy are...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
... progress of producing hydrogen is also require the use of energy from those resources....
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'generated'.
Suggestion: generated
... the process of making hydrogen is also generate pollution. She points her attention to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...to create engergy. The professor is not agree with the author. She believes that due ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05517241379 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59571585209 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524137931034 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4233657643 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329850750051 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105578045306 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893596840487 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203013147134 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623646967131 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.