Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Imagine the earth fully covered of concrete, meters high in the sky. It may amuse most of us seeing the heights man has achieved but at the bottom of heart, we all can feel that something very important is missing. In a world developed so high, a mere ethereal sight of flora and fauna would be all that most of us would desire. For all the potential economic gains that can be materialized we all should understand the cost that we will have to bear in terms of lose of nature. There are several consequence that will emerge if economic gains get priority over wilderness.
To begin with, construction destroys the natural habitation of plants as well as animals, leaving them homeless, wandering to lands unknown and paths precarious. Hoping to catch some prey for the starving stomach, weak and stranded these specious meet their demise. These is an obscured reality, this happens in the forests that are chopped for fulfilling the demands of land.
Moreover, developing in the areas that are natural habitats for various specious leaves no choice to the animals and birds other than either adapting to this new environment or migrating to some other place. Those who choose not to migrate, once in a while have an encounter with the neighboring humans, which endangers both lives. For example, several cases of Cheetah and Coyote attacks have been reported in densely populated areas of Delhi in India.
Additionally, the construction affects surrounding fauna, by damaging the air and water through pollution. Very frequently we all get to read articles that present the impact of decreasing level air quality. Almost all the metropolitan cities are suffering the decline in air quality. These is only because not enough plantation is present around these enormously constructed metro cities. Take for an example, the recent clouds of smog that surrounded major cities in China and India for weeks.
Conversely, some will argue that it is important that we develop the potential sites for their economic gains. Yes, that should be done provided that precautions has been taken to preserve the resident flora and fauna. City plans can consider leaving space of greenery, and no trespassing should be allowed in areas where the animal husbandry is preserved. Human safety can be confirmed with high mounted walls and protective fences around such natural parks.
Conclusively, it is very important to consider the impact which is caused by never ending human demands on mother nature. Both the nature as well as development are crucial for human being and therefore equal importance should be given to both.
- About us 33
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 58
- we are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in businesses, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. what things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspici 56
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun consequence seems to be countable; consider using: 'several consequences'.
Suggestion: several consequences
...r in terms of lose of nature. There are several consequence that will emerge if economic gains get ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...anded these specious meet their demise. These is an obscured reality, this happens in...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...e suffering the decline in air quality. These is only because not enough plantation i...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 138, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...mands on mother nature. Both the nature as well as development are crucial for human being...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 2260.96107784 97% => OK
No of words: 432.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0787037037 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60232548081 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 204.123752495 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576388888889 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 705.55239521 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8424045031 57.8364921388 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239111251944 0.218282227539 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607393509144 0.0743258471296 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052616305784 0.0701772020484 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118137151952 0.128457276422 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556110559879 0.0628817314937 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 98.500998004 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.