Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
A nations achievement can not be judged by solely looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists neither by only evaluating the general welfare of all its people. As it depends on both. A success of nation gains international credibility when rulers, artists or scientist receive accolades from other countries. And spending on such activities makes sense only when people at home are happy with their life. Any nation has to wisely ration between these two factors to make sure of their growth.
To begin with, when scientists, artists or athletes gain credit at international events, respect of their nation is incremented for being capable of producing great talents. The platforms that compare several nations, when captured by any particular country, results in making the nation feel proud of itself. It helps its citizens feel patriotic, and be thankful for what there country has done for them. One such event is Olympics, there is a feeling of competition among every citizen of all participating countries, all of us stick to our televisions to get the latest count of acquired medals.
On the other hand, the general welfare of citizens is of similar importance, as no talent can be produced if resources for basic needs of day to day life are scarce. Availability of drinking water, consistent meals and education of children are the general demands of citizens from any country. Without these no nation can prove itself successful. Take for instance, North Korea, their scientists might succeed in successfully testing nuclear warheads, but the dearth of food and education for children attracts lots of negative criticism.
Moreover, the developing countries like India have done an exemplary task for gaining international respect. They are excelling in social welfare, and have gained international recognition for harnessing talent minds. The children are being provided with necessary education, jobs are being generated for the poor and most citizens get consistent meals.
Additionally, the students from India mostly graduate in subjects among STEM fields. With a highest GDP, even in times when global economy is slow, they have managed to keep their cash flowing. Now they are being seen as a competitive consumer market by multiple nations.
Conclusively, it is the property of citizens that enables one to produce talent on large scales that could compete globally. Any nation should properly ration its resources to make sure that both ends, general welfare, as well as talent recognition, are covered properly.
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main cause of crime? How can we deal with those cause? 61
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 64
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 42
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.Write a response in which you dis 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
A nations achievement can not be judged by solely...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 91, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ate in subjects among STEM fields. With a highest GDP, even in times when global ...
^
Line 10, column 220, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e sure that both ends, general welfare, as well as talent recognition, are covered properl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3144963145 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7962199257 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587223587224 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7249183044 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194654851685 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550050571421 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879978378648 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949950506863 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975774055427 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.